Hospitalization has been associated with the development of sarcopenia. This study aimed to examine the new incidences of hospital sarcopenia, associated risk factors and health outcomes, as defined by internationally recognized diagnostic criteria in hospitalized older people. Pre-defined search terms were run through five databases. Six studies that assessed sarcopenia on two separate time points during hospitalization on older inpatients were included. Prevalence of sarcopenia varied from 14.1% to 55% depending on diagnostic criteria and cut-off points used. New sarcopenia occurred between 12% to 38.7% patients following hospitalization. Risk factors were older age, longer duration of bed rest, lower baseline body mass index, cognitive impairment and activities of daily living disability. None of the studies reported health outcomes associated with newly developed sarcopenia in hospital.

Introduction Hand grip strength is a useful measure of muscle function. Many hand dynamometers that are less costly than the gold standard Jamar dynamometer are available but their use in clinical outpatient setting has yet to be validated. This study aimed to determine the inter-instrument reliability between Camry electronic and Jamar hydraulic dynamometers. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years during their post COVID-19 follow up clinic visit. Hand grip strength was assessed using both Jamar and Camry dynamometers following standard protocol while information on participants’ demographics, health and COVID-19 hospitalizations were collected from hospital electronic medical records. Reliability between both devices was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and devices were compared based on subcategories of participants’ demographics and clinical characteristics. Results Ninety-three participants (mean age: 73 ± 6 years, 52.7% males) were recruited in this study. Average grip strength recorded with Jamar dynamometer (18.1 ± 7.4 kg) was higher than Camry dynamometer (19.5 ± 6.6 kg). Sub categorical comparison depicted no significant discrepancy between the devices discovered among male participants (p = 0.262), Malay participants (p = 0.243) and participants aged >70 years (p = 0.090). According to the diagnostic cut-off recommended by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019, similar number of participants had low grip strength using Jamar (n = 69, 74.2%) and Camry (n = 68, 73.2%) dynamometers. The odds of Camry detecting low grip strength was 0.946 times (95% CI: 0.493–1.817) as compared to Jamar dynamometer. Readings measured using both dynamometers were highly correlated to each other (r = 0.88) with ICC of 0.92, indicating an excellent inter-instrument reliability. Conclusion Comparable measures between Jamar and Camry hand dynamometers support the interchangeable use of the devices among older population. Hence, the alternative use of Camry dynamometer is appropriate for the outpatient setting.

Introduction Muscle strength is one crucial determinant of functional activity among older adults. While COVID-19 infection is often described as an acute respiratory disease with potential multiorgan involvement, its severe inflammatory nature may lead to changes to structure and function of skeletal muscles. This present study aimed to evaluate grip strength among post COVID-19 elderly with exploration of factors influencing the change in grip strength. Method Patients with history of COVID-19 infection aged ≥65 years were recruited in the COVID-19 follow up clinic. Grip strength was assessed using Jamar dynamometer following standard protocol while baseline clinical information was collected from hospital electronic medical record. Data collected were analysed to evaluate grip strength in relation to participants’ demographics, comorbidity, length of hospital stay and steroids medication use. Total steroids equivalent doses were calculated and dichotomy of 400 mg was selected based on its median. Results Ninety-three participants (mean [SD] age: 73 [6], 52.7% males) were recruited at an average (SD) of 55 (37) days after hospital discharge, with 79.6% participants hospitalized with COVID-19 of clinical category 4. Majority (74.2%) of the participants recorded measurements lower than diagnostic cut-off for low grip strength recommended by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019. Results showed that increasing age was associated with a decrease in grip strength (r = −0.30, p = 0.003). Besides, increase in hospital stay (r = −0.22, p = 0.035) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (r = −0.42, p = 0.000) were associated with decreasing grip strength measurements. No significant discrepancy in grip strength was observed between subgroups of patients receiving total steroids equivalent doses of <400 mg and ≥ 400 mg (p = 0.881). Conclusion Low grip strength readings were recorded among post COVID-19 elderly particularly patients of older age, with longer hospital stay and higher CCI. This suggests the need for close monitoring and provision of rehabilitation intervention to older adults affected by COVID-19 infection.