In endodontic microsurgery, it is likely that preoperative factors, particularly the tooth position and arch type, have a greater influence on the healing outcome than intra- and post-operative factors.
A tooth is a complex biological organ and consists of multiple tissues including the enamel, dentin, cementum and pulp. Tooth loss is the most common organ failure. Can a tooth be regenerated? Can adult stem cells be orchestrated to regenerate tooth structures such as the enamel, dentin, cementum and dental pulp, or even an entire tooth? If not, what are the therapeutically viable sources of stem cells for tooth regeneration? Do stem cells necessarily need to be taken out of the body, and manipulated ex vivo before they are transplanted for tooth regeneration? How can regenerated teeth be economically competitive with dental implants? Would it be possible to make regenerated teeth affordable by a large segment of the population worldwide? This review article explores existing and visionary approaches that address some of the above-mentioned questions. Tooth regeneration represents a revolution in stomatology as a shift in the paradigm from repair to regeneration: repair is by metal or artificial materials whereas regeneration is by biological restoration. Tooth regeneration is an extension of the concepts in the broad field of regenerative medicine to restore a tissue defect to its original form and function by biological substitutes.
The regeneration of the pulp-dentin complex has been a great challenge to both scientists and clinicians. Previous work has shown that the presence of prior infection may influence the characteristics of tissues formed in the root canal space after regenerative endodontic treatment. The formation of ectopic tissues such as periodontal ligament, bone, and cementum has been observed in the root canal space of immature necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis, while the regeneration of dentin and pulp has been identified in previously non-infected teeth. The current regenerative endodontic therapy utilizes disinfection protocols, which heavily rely on chemical irrigation using conventional disinfectants. From a microbiological point of view, the current protocols may not allow a sufficiently clean root canal microenvironment, which is critical for dentin and pulp regeneration. In this article, the significance of root canal disinfection in regenerating the pulp-dentin complex, the limitations of the current regenerative endodontic disinfection protocols, and advanced disinfection techniques designed to reduce the microorganisms and biofilms in chronic infection are discussed.
Control of blood clotting in root canal systems is one of the most critical and difficult concerns for regenerative endodontics therapy (RET). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of using gelatin- and fibrin-based hemostatic hydrogels as a scaffold on pulp regeneration in a minipig model
.
Cell viability of human dental pulp stem cells cultured three-dimensionally in gelatin-based and fibrin-based scaffolds was evaluated by MTT and live/dead assay. RET was performed on 24 immature premolars with an autologous blood clot (PC), gelatin-based and fibrin-based hemostatic matrices (GM and FM), or without the insertion of a scaffold (NC). The follow-up period was 12 weeks. Radiographic and histologic assessments for pulp regeneration were performed. Gelatin-based scaffolds exhibited significantly higher cell viability than fibrin-based scaffolds after 15 days (
P
< 0.05). The PC and GM groups showed favorable root development without inflammation and newly mineralized tissue deposited in the root canal system, while FM group presented inflammatory changes with the continuation of root development. The NC group exhibited internal root resorption with periapical lesions. The application of GM in RET led to favorable clinical outcomes of root development without inflammatory changes compared to conventional RET. Our results suggest that GM may serve as a viable regenerative scaffold for pulp regeneration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.