Wind responses on a twin box girder bridge can be observed by a wind tunnel experiment or by having a full-scale setup if possible. Another possible approach is to go through a numerical approach, which is the CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer surrounding the twin box girder bridge deck. A virtual wind tunnel CFD modelling simulation was carried out on the bridge deck using the Ansys Fluent FSI technique to find out the displacement of the bridge deck. The steady-state simulations have been computed. The turbulence model was used to calculate the mean force coefficients as K-ω SST. It has been seen that steady simulation is needed to get the static aerodynamic coefficients right when modeling. Ansys ICEM CFD is used for meshing the bridge deck. In this study, the wind flow behaviour around the structure is analysed at different wind incident angles of -10°, -5°, 0°, 5°, and 10°. The pressure variations at different wind directions are mapped in the present work. Responses across and along the wind are also depicted. It has been found that the drag coefficient is higher at low angles of attack, whereas the moment and the lift coefficient are showing fewer values at large angles.

Wind responses on a twin box girder bridge can be observed by a wind tunnel experiment or by having a full-scale setup if possible. Another possible approach is to go through a numerical approach, which is the CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer surrounding the twin box girder bridge deck. A virtual wind tunnel CFD modelling simulation was carried out on the bridge deck using the Ansys Fluent FSI technique to nd out the displacement of the bridge deck. The steady-state simulations have been computed. The turbulence model was used to calculate the mean force coe cients as K-ω SST. It has been seen that steady simulation is needed to get the static aerodynamic coe cients right when modeling. Ansys ICEM CFD is used for meshing the bridge deck. In this study, the wind ow behaviour around the structure is analysed at different wind incident angles of -10°, -5°, 0°, 5°, and 10°. The pressure variations at different wind directions are mapped in the present work. Responses across and along the wind are also depicted. It has been found that the drag coe cient is higher at low angles of attack, whereas the moment and the lift coe cient are showing fewer values at large angles. Highlights 1. The pressure variations on the boundary of bridge deck.2. The displacement of the bridge deck due to wind pressure.3. The effect of different wind angles on ow variations around the bridge deck.