Summary: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with simultaneous prepectoral direct to implant reconstruction and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is increasingly offered to patients opting for prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomies. The recent introduction of prepectoral implant/ADM in the armamentarium of breast reconstruction has proven to reduce pain and animation deformity. Despite this promising method, patients with macromastia and ptotic breasts remain a challenging group to treat. More often they would require secondary corrective procedures and can experience high failure rate and unsatisfactory outcomes. The authors present their experience in utilizing a bipedicled nipple-areola complex dermal flap through Wise pattern to achieve a successful NSM with prepectoral implant/ADM (Braxon) wrap (IBW) as a single stage in patients with large ptotic breasts. Patients seeking NSM with large ptotic breasts were included in the study in the period between 2016 and 2018. They were offered a single-stage Wise pattern NSM and immediate prepectoral IBW breast reconstruction. The technique and outcomes were recorded. Sixteen reconstructions were performed in 8 women with a median age of 32 years (range, 27–50 years) and a median body mass index of 32 kg/m2 (range, 29–39 kg/m2). The resected breasts weight ranged from 750 to 1,600 g (median, 890 g). All procedures were completed successfully with no nipple-areola complex necrosis or failure experienced during the follow-up period (range, 3–24 months) with all patients reported excellent satisfaction. The authors’ results demonstrate that this technique could be safely planned for NSM in large ptotic breasts with excellent durable outcomes.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

No abstract

Summary: The anterioabdominal wall is the most common site for low molecular weight heparin administration for anticoagulation, either for prophylactic or for therapeutic indications. Occasionally, this could be associated with damage of the abdominal pannus microvasculature, which could possibly jeopardize the reliability of free abdominal flaps as deep inferior epigastric perforator and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle, especially with therapeutic anticoagulation therapy. These flaps are reliant on a highly intricate complex vascular anatomy and perforasomes for their adequate perfusion and survival. The authors report a case of nonobstructive microvascular failure of a free muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle utilized for soft tissue coverage following resection of a chest wall breast cancer recurrence on a background of portacath-induced deep venous thrombosis of the axillary and subclavian vein whilst on chemotherapy. History of long-term therapeutic low molecular weight heparin administration in the abdomen resulted in microangiopathic densities evident on computerized tomography scan with subsequent flap failure due to possible jeopardization of the flap microvasculature and perfusion. Following exclusion of common local and systemic factors that can cause vascular compromise, a debridement and salvage re-reconstruction procedure utilizing a contralateral free latissimus dorsi flap was performed. Reconstructive surgeons should be cautious when planning to utilize free abdominal-based flaps on the background of long-term therapeutic low molecular weight heparin administration in the abdomen and may possibly explore other alternative options of using non-abdominal free flaps from the reconstructive armamentarium within this unique context.