This study aimed to investigate the cervical collar impact on the functional outcomes of patients after posterior cervical laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation (PCLF) surgery. Overview of Literature: The safety and possible benefits of implementing rigid cervical collars subsequent to PCLF are insufficiently investigated. Methods: Patients who underwent PCLF and received postoperative cervical collars from 2018 to 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Their data were compared with an age-and sex-matched group of subjects who did not receive collars after PCLF during the same period. Pain intensity (using the Visual Analog Scale), Neck Disability Index, and quality of life (using 36-item Short Form Health Survey) of the patients were compared at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 36 patients who received cervical collars after surgery and 40 controls were included. At baseline and 1-month follow-up, there were no differences in pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life between the groups. However, at 3 months postoperatively, the quality of life of the subjects with no orthosis was higher than those who received cervical collars (p=0.01). At 6and 12-month follow-up, there were no differences between the groups in pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life. Conclusions: No difference in the pain intensity and functional status of patients who used cervical collars and controls was shown in our study. Patients who did not wear cervical collars had a higher quality of life during the 3-month postoperative evaluation. Future prospective, well-controlled studies with longer follow-ups are needed to further investigate the effects of cervical orthosis on the clinical outcome of patients after PCLF.

Background: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in posterior pelvic ring fractures is challenging and commonly performed under fluoroscopy or navigation techniques. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous iliosacral screw implantation under fluoroscopy guidance with only inlet and outlet views. Methods: This retrospective study included 58 consecutive unstable posterior pelvic injury patients (36 sacral fractures and 22 sacroiliac joint disruptions) treated with percutaneous iliosacral screws between January 2015 and November 2019. Acceptable inlet radiographs show the anterior cortex of the S1 body superimposed on the S2 body. Acceptable outlet radiographs show the superior pubic symphysis at the level of the S2 foramen and visualize the S1 and S2 sacral foramina. In our technique, the screw was inserted at the inferior half of the outlet view and the posterior half of the inlet view. The time needed for screw insertion and the radiation exposure time was recorded. Intra and postoperative complications were documented. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans assessed screw position. Results: In total, 69 iliosacral screws were inserted in 58 patients. In postoperative CT scans, the screw position was assessed, 89.8% were in a secure position, and 10.2% had malposition. The mean operation time per screw was 21.18 min and the mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 112 s. There was no evidence of wound infection or iatrogenic neurovascular injury. No reoperation was performed. Conclusion: Percutaneous iliosacral screws can be placed using the only outlet and inlet fluoroscopic views with comparable radiological and clinical outcomes to the conventional method.