Purpose: To describe the multicolor imaging (MCI) features in a series of patients diagnosed with a choroidal nevus and compare it vis-à-vis color fundus photography (CFP) in identifying the lesion. Methods: In this retrospective, descriptive case series at a tertiary referral center in South India, all patients diagnosed with the choroidal nevus underwent CFP, optical coherence tomography, MCI, and infrared reflectance (IR) imaging. Results: In this study, we found that on MCI, the choroidal nevus could be identified in only six of the 12 eyes. The lesions were seen as an area of hyperreflectance on IR image and orange-colored lesion on multicolor image. In one eye, there was a mixed pattern of hyper and hyporeflectance on IR imaging. The remaining five eyes with choroidal nevus lesions were not identified on MCI. Conclusion: The variable features of the choroidal nevus on MCI are most likely due to the variable melanin content within the nevus cells. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.

Purpose: To report the imaging characteristics of various clinical features in idiopathic macular telangiectasia (MacTel 2) on multicolor imaging (MCI) and compare its accuracy vis-à-vis color fundus photograph (CFP) and fluorescein angiography (FA). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 54 eyes of 27 patients with MacTel 2 were included after institutional review board approval. Multimodal imaging with CFP, optical coherence tomography (OCT), MCI, and FA was done. Images were analyzed to identify and describe the clinical findings in MacTel 2. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed for the various imaging modalities in MacTel 2. Results: In this study, the MCI identified all the different clinical features of MacTel 2 in 100% of cases. The confocal blue reflectance (BR) image was more sensitive than CFP (100% vs. 96.3%) in identifying the loss of retinal transparency in MacTel 2. For other clinical features such as right-angled vessels, superficial retinal crystals, and retinal pigment epithelial hyperplasia/plaques, the sensitivity of BR, and green reflectance (GR) image, was comparable to that of CFP. Confocal infrared reflectance (IR) images showed poor sensitivity in identifying the non-proliferative features in MacTel 2 (P < 0.001). Loss of retinal transparency was not picked up on IR image. Other features such as right-angled vessels, superficial retinal crystals, and pigment plaques were seen in 20%, 4.6%, and 26.3% of cases, respectively. However, confocal IR images were superior to FA (100% vs. 47%) and CFP (100% vs. 15%) in identifying the extent and location of subretinal neovascular membrane. The confocal BR and GR images were unable to identify the choroidal neovascular membrane (P < 0.001). Conclusion: MCI is a useful and non-invasive imaging modality to identify the clinical features in MacTel 2. MCI can be used as a complementary imaging tool to CFP, FA, and OCT.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Multicolour imaging (MI) is a novel, non-invasive retinal imaging technology. Its sensitivity for detecting the clinical features in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) has not been previously described. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of MI compared to fluorescein angiography and colour fundus photography in CSCR, and to describe the imaging features of MI. Methods: In this retrospective study at a tertiary referral centre, 63 consecutive eyes with CSCR (both acute and chronic) were included after obtaining permission from the institutional review board. Multimodal imaging with colour fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, MI and fluorescein angiography/indocyanine green angiography and nearinfrared and blue wavelength autofluorescence was analysed to identify the clinical findings in CSCR. Sensitivity and specificity values were computed for the different clinical features for each imaging modality. Results: On comparison with fluorescein angiography, MI was found to be more effective in identifying the extent of subretinal fluid (78 per cent versus 13 per cent). MI was equally capable in identifying pigment epithelium detachment (100 per cent versus 100 per cent) and retinal pigment epithelial changes (100 per cent versus 100 per cent). Focal leaks were identified in 84 per cent and 97 per cent of eyes using MI and fluorescein angiography imaging, respectively. The sensitivity of MI in identifying focal retinal pigment epithelial leaks was higher compared to near-infrared autofluorescence (84 per cent versus 34 per cent) and blue wavelength autofluorescence (84 per cent versus 18 per cent) imaging. Conclusion: MI is a useful, non-invasive imaging modality for detecting clinical features in CSCR. In the future, MI has the potential to substitute for fluorescein angiography and colour fundus photography as the imaging modality of choice.