Because practice-based data on the usage of idarucizumab for urgent dabigatran reversal is unavailable, we evaluated the appropriateness of idarucizumab usage, its haemostatic effectiveness and clinical outcomes.

Background: Although dabigatran has a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy for venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, major bleeding events, including gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, may occur. Therefore, our aim was to provide insights into the efficacy and safety of idarucizumab for urgent dabigatran reversal in patients with major GI bleeding. Methods: Patients with uncontrollable GI bleeding requiring reversal were enrolled from June 2014 through July 2016 in the RE-VERSE AD study (Reversal of Dabigatran Anticoagulant Effect With Idarucizumab), a prospective, multicenter, open-label study of idarucizumab, and were followed up for 90 days for primary and secondary outcomes. Patients were to receive a 5-g dose of intravenous idarucizumab, administered as 2 bolus infusions of 2.5 g no more than 15 minutes apart. The primary end point was the maximum reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation within 4 hours after administration of idarucizumab as measured by the dabigatran-specific assays diluted thrombin time and ecarin clotting time. Further end points included investigator-reported bleeding cessation within the first 24 hours and incidence of rebleeding, thromboembolic events, or mortality. Results: GI bleeding occurred in 137 patients enrolled in RE-VERSE AD, of which 84% was adjudicated as major or life-threatening, 48 (35.0%) was upper GI tract in origin, 43 (31.4%) was lower GI in origin, and 46 (33.6%) was either both or unknown. Complete reversal of dabigatran was observed in 118 of 121 patients (97.5%) with an elevated diluted thrombin time at presentation and 95 of 131 patients (72.5%) with an elevated ecarin clotting time and was similar for upper and lower GI bleeding. Bleeding cessation within 24 hours was reported in 92 of 134 evaluable patients (68.7%) after a median duration of 2.4 hours (interquartile range, 2.0–3.9 hours). During the 90-day follow-up, 6 patients (4.4%) had a postreversal thromboembolic event, and 20 patients (14.6%) died. Conclusions: Idarucizumab showed a rapid and complete reversal of dabigatran activity in nearly all patients presenting with GI bleeding, facilitating emergency patient care without the additional presence of anticoagulation. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02104947.

Essentials• Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) injections for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be burdensome.• Patients with active cancer and confirmed VTE were included to evaluate LMWH continuation.• The cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 21% after a median period of 90 days.• One out of five patients discontinued LMWH injections because of side effects.Summary. Background: Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) monotherapy for 3-6 months as the first-line treatment for cancerassociated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, although daily administration of LMWH injections over a course of several months may be burdensome, the number of patients who stop treatment because of LMWH side-effects is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the continuation rate and complications of daily LMWH injections in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Methods: Consecutive patients with active cancer and objectively confirmed symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, treated at three Dutch hospitals and one Spanish hospital, were included to evaluate continuation LMWH therapy during LMWH treatment.Patients were excluded when they received other anticoagulants, were lost to follow-up, or experienced a venous catheter-associated thrombosis. Results: A total of 372 patients were analyzed during LMWH treatment for a maximum of 180 days. The cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-25) after a median period of 90 days (interquartile range 60-120 days). Only female sex was found to be significantly associated with premature LMWH discontinuation (odds ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.03-2.5). Thirty patients (8.1%) developed recurrent VTE, 30 patients (8.3%) suffered a major bleed, and 106 patients (28%) died. Conclusion: Our study reveals that one of five patients with cancer-associated VTE stopped LMWH injections because of side-effects. This finding provides relevant background information for current clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants as compared with LMWH.

The optimal antithrombotic therapy following mitral valve repair (MVr) is still a matter of debate. Therefore, we evaluated the rate of thromboembolic and bleeding complications of two antithrombotic prevention strategies: vitamin K antagonists (VKA) versus aspirin. Consecutive patients who underwent MVr between 2004 and 2016 at three Dutch hospitals were evaluated for thromboembolic and bleeding complications during three postoperative months. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding complications to determine the net clinical benefit of VKA strategy as compared with aspirin. Secondary objectives were to evaluate both thromboembolic and bleeding rates separately and to identify predictors for both complications. A total of 469 patients were analyzed, of whom 325 patients (69%) in the VKA group and 144 patients (31%) in the aspirin group. Three months postoperatively, the cumulative incidence of the combined end point of the study was 9.2% (95%CI 6.1–12) in the VKA group and 11% (95%CI 6.0–17) in the aspirin group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95%CI 0.83–3.1]. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in thromboembolic rates (adjusted HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.16–4.2) as well as in major bleeding rates (adjusted HR 1.89, 95%CI 0.90–3.9). VKA and aspirin therapy showed a similar event rate of 10% during 3 months after MVr in patients without prior history of AF. In both treatment groups thromboembolic event rate was low and major bleeding rates were comparable. Future prospective, randomized trials are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Home treatment of acute pulmonary embolism is suggested to be feasible and safe in 30-55% of all patients. Results of ongoing trials will provide more insight in the optimal strategy to select patients with pulmonary embolism who are eligible for home treatment and likely will result in more widespread application of this practice.