Millimeter wave (mmWave) communication has recently been proposed for use in commercial cellular systems as a solution to the microwave spectrum gridlock. MmWave spectrum is (potentially) available around the globe and recent hardware advances make mass market deployments feasible. In this paper, we study the coverage and capacity of mmWave cellular systems with a special focus on their key differentiating factors such as the limited scattering nature of mmWave channels, and the use of RF beamforming strategies such as beam steering to provide highly directional transmission with limited hardware complexity. We show that, in general, coverage in mmWave systems can rival or even exceed coverage in microwave systems assuming that the link budgets promised by existing mmWave system designs are in fact achieved. This comparable coverage translates into a superior average rate performance for mmWave systems as a result of the larger bandwidth available for transmission.

Abstract-Interference coordination improves data rates and reduces outages in cellular networks. Accurately evaluating the gains of coordination, however, is contingent upon using a network topology that models realistic cellular deployments. In this paper, we model the base stations locations as a Poisson point process to provide a better analytical assessment of the performance of coordination. Since interference coordination is only feasible within clusters of limited size, we consider a random clustering process where cluster stations are located according to a random point process and groups of base stations associated with the same cluster coordinate. We assume channel knowledge is exchanged among coordinating base stations, and we analyze the performance of interference coordination when channel knowledge at the transmitters is either perfect or acquired through limited feedback. We apply intercell interference nulling (ICIN) to coordinate interference inside the clusters. The feasibility of ICIN depends on the number of antennas at the base stations. Using tools from stochastic geometry, we derive the probability of coverage and the average rate for a typical mobile user. We show that the average cluster size can be optimized as a function of the number of antennas to maximize the gains of ICIN. To minimize the mean loss in rate due to limited feedback, we propose an adaptive feedback allocation strategy at the mobile users. We show that adapting the bit allocation as a function of the signals' strength increases the achievable rate with limited feedback, compared to equal bit partitioning. Finally, we illustrate how this analysis can help solve network design problems such as identifying regions where coordination provides gains based on average cluster size, number of antennas, and number of feedback bits.

Limited feedback improves link reliability with a small amount of feedback from the receiver back to the transmitter. In cellular systems, the performance of limited feedback will be degraded in the presence of other cell interference, when the base stations have limited or no coordination. This paper establishes the degradation in sum rate of users in a cellular system, due to uncoordinated other cell interference and delay on the feedback channel. A goodput metric is defined as the rate when the bits are successfully received at the mobile station, and used to derive an upper bound on the performance of limited feedback systems with delay. This paper shows that the goodput gained from having delayed limited feedback decreases doubly exponentially as the delay increases.The analysis is extended to precoded spatial multiplexing systems where it is shown that the same upper bound can be used to evaluate the decay in the achievable sum rate. To reduce the effects of interference, zero forcing interference cancellation is applied at the receiver, where it is shown that the effect of the interference on the achievable sum rate can be suppressed by nulling out the interferer. Numerical results show that the decay rate of the goodput decreases when the codebook quantization size increases and when the doppler shift in the channel decreases.

Abstract-We consider coordination in a multi-user multiple input single output cellular system. In contrast with existing base station cooperation methods that rely on sharing CSI with or without user data to manage interference, we propose to share user data only. We consider a system where blind interference alignment (BIA) is applied to serve multiple users in each cell. We apply interference coordination through data sharing to mitigate other-cell interference at the cell-edge users. While BIA mitigates intra-cell interference in MU-MISO systems, it does not address the problem of inter-cell interference. We apply interference coordination through data sharing to mitigate inter-cell interference at the cell-edge users. We propose a new cooperative BIA scheme that takes into account the users whose data is being shared between adjacent base stations. We derive the achievable sum rate with interference mitigation and we compare it to achievable rates with the original BIA strategy. Numerical results show that the achievable sum rate of the celledge users with data sharing decreases with increasing number of served users in each cell and increasing number of antennas at the base stations.

We consider spatial interference mitigation at the transmitter for multiple input single output ad hoc networks. We apply zero forcing beamforming at the transmitter, and analyze the corresponding network throughput and transmission capacity. Assuming a network with Poisson distributed transmitting nodes and spatially independent Rayleigh fading channels, we apply mathematical tools from stochastic geometry to derive a lower bound on the probability of outage. We derive scaling laws for the transmission capacity and show that for a large number of antennas, the maximum density of concurrently transmitting nodes scales linearly with the number of antennas at the transmitter, for a given outage constraint. Numerical results show that the network throughput achieved by interference nulling at the transmitter is comparable to that achieved by interference cancellation at the receiver.