Successful surgical repair of aortic coarctation during childhood may have major late complications such as pseudoaneurysm formation. If left untreated, pseudoaneuryms put patients at risk for morbidity and death; if treated surgically, they are associated with complications. Endovascular aortic repair, an established safe alternative to open surgical repair, is associated with encouraging outcomes and fewer complications, and it is especially feasible for patients who have undergone multiple aortic surgeries. We report the case of a 41-year-old man who underwent endovascular repair of a pseudoaneurysm after previous surgical corrections of an aortic coarctation at 6 and 14 years of age. The pseudoaneurysm, involving the distal portion of an ascending-to-descending aortic 20-mm Dacron bypass graft, was successfully excluded with a thoracic stent-graft and sealed off with vascular plugs to prevent both blood flow into the pseudoaneurysm and type II endoleak.
Improved management of interrupted aortic arch has increased long-term survival rates. Longer life expectancies in neonates and children surgically treated for interrupted aortic arch may necessitate complex reinterventions when sequelae develop in adulthood. We report the case of a 24-year-old man who had undergone initial repair of interrupted aortic arch type B at one week and reintervention at 6 years of age. He presented with a 5.5 × 9-cm pseudoaneurysm of the proximal descending thoracic aorta. He underwent surgical replacement of his distal aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta, with a bypass to his left subclavian artery. In addition to our patient's case, we discuss considerations in treating recipients of early interrupted aortic arch repairs as they live longer and undergo multiple reinterventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.