Background: Diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis is difficult because clinical signs and laboratory tests are non-specific. Early antibiotic therapy is crucial for treatment success. Objective: To evaluate the effect of procalcitonin (PCT)-guided decision-making on duration of antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal early-onset sepsis. Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized intervention study was conducted in a tertiary neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit in the Children’s Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland, between June 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006. All term and near-term infants (gestational age ≧34 weeks) with suspected early-onset sepsis were randomly assigned either to standard treatment based on conventional laboratory parameters (standard group) or to PCT-guided treatment (PCT group). Minimum duration of antibiotic therapy was 48–72 h in the standard group, whereas in the PCT group antibiotic therapy was discontinued when two consecutive PCT values were below predefined age-adjusted cut-off values. Results: 121 newborns were randomly assigned either to the standard group (n = 61) or the PCT group (n = 60). The two groups were similar for baseline demographics, risk factors for early-onset sepsis, likelihood of infection as assessed by the attending physician and early conventional laboratory findings. There was a significant difference in the proportion of newborns treated with antibiotics ≧72 h between the standard group (82%) and the PCT group (55%) (absolute risk reduction 27%; odds ratio 0.27 (95% CI 0.12–0.62), p = 0.002). On average, PCT-guided decision-making resulted in a shortening of 22.4 h of antibiotic therapy. Clinical outcome was similar and favorable in both groups but sample size was insufficient to exclude rare adverse events. Conclusion:Serial PCT determinations allow to shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy in term and near-term infants with suspected early-onset sepsis. Before this PCT-guided strategy can be recommended, its safety has to be confirmed in a larger cohort of neonates.
Background & aims: In preterm infants, natural variation of breast milk composition makes it difficult to achieve recommended macronutrient intakes with standard fortification. Evidence suggests that nutritional deficiency induces poor postnatal growth. This study investigates impacts of target fortification on preterm growth and metabolism by adjusting breast milk macronutrients. Methods: This study was conducted as a single-centre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial for infants <30 gestational weeks. The control group received standard fortification and the intervention group received standard plus target fortification adding modular protein, lipids, and carbohydrates. Breast milk content was measured 3x/week using a validated near-infrared bedside spectrometer (NIRS). Modulars were added to achieve recommended values. To assess total nutrient intake, all 2810 native breast milk samples were analyzed -protein and fat using bedside-NIRS, lactose using tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Body composition was measured using air displacement plethysmography. Primary outcome was weight gain during the first 21 days of intervention. Results: Baseline characteristics, morbidities, and total fluid intake were not different between groups (intervention n ¼ 52, control n ¼ 51). The intervention group infants had higher macronutrient intakes, weight gain (21.2 ± 2.5 vs 19.3 ± 2.4 g/kg/d, mean difference: 1.9 g/kg/d, 95% CI: 0.9 -2.9), and body weight. Infants in the intervention group from mothers with below-average breast milk protein content showed greatest impact on weight at 36 weeks (2580 ± 280 g vs 2210 ± 300 g), length, head circumference, fat, and fat-free mass. Also, feeding intolerance was less frequent, blood urea was higher, and triglycerides were lower. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that target fortification of breast milk with low macronutrient content enhances the quality of nutrition and growth and is feasible in clinical routine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.