Summary This study reviews publications to describe the signs, symptoms and impact of tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) on patients’ burden of disease. TIO is associated with a spectrum of signs and symptoms imposing a significant clinical burden, but the psychosocial impact of this rare disease has been poorly researched so far. Introduction To describe the signs, symptoms and impacts of tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) and summarise the state of research on the burden of disease of this ultra-rare condition. Methods A targeted literature review was conducted in PubMed using pre-defined search terms. Relevant articles published between 1980 and 2021 were screened for inclusion. Seventy records were selected for analysis. Data were extracted and grouped into categories and sub-categories to identify recurrent signs, symptoms and impacts of TIO and describe the burden on patients. Chord diagrams were created to analyse the relationships between different TIO outcomes and characterise the presentation of TIO. Results Although the number of articles on TIO published have been increasing over the past 20 years, most studies were case reports and case series ( n = 65/70) and only few were studies with higher quality of evidence ( n = 5/70). Most articles were based on data reported by clinicians ( n = 67/70). Patients with TIO experienced a combination of outcomes including chronic pain, weakness, skeletal-related manifestations and limitations in mobility. Only a few studies ( n = 2/70) analysed the burden of TIO on the emotional wellbeing and on the work life of the patient. Conclusion Patients with TIO present with a spectrum of signs and symptoms that impose a significant burden. The impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of patients should be further investigated, as this has been poorly researched so far. Studies with high quality of evidence should be designed to further the understanding of the burden of disease of TIO from the patient’s perspective.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in healthy controls. We aim to test whether these antibodies are pathogenic and may cause isolated psychosis. The SINAPPS2 phase IIa double-blinded randomised controlled trial will test the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment versus placebo for patients with acute psychosis symptoms as added to psychiatric standard of care. Methods We will screen approximately 2500 adult patients with acute psychosis to identify 160 with antibody-positive psychosis without co-existing neurological disease and recruit about 80 eligible participants to the trial in the period from September 2017 to September 2021 across the UK. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 either to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by rituximab or to placebo infusions of 1% albumin followed by 0.9% sodium chloride, respectively. To detect a time-to-symptomatic-recovery hazard ratio of 0.322 with a power of 80%, 56 participants are needed to complete the trial, allowing for up to 12 participants to drop out of each group. Eligible patients will be randomised and assessed at baseline within 4 weeks of their eligibility confirmation. The treatment will start with IVIG or 1% albumin placebo infusions over 2–4 consecutive days no later than 7 days from baseline. It will continue 4–5 weeks later with a rituximab or sodium chloride placebo infusion and will end 2–3 weeks after this with another rituximab or placebo infusion. The primary outcome is the time to symptomatic recovery defined as symptomatic remission sustained for at least 6 months on the following Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items: P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5 and G9. Participants will be followed for 12 months from the first day of treatment or, where sustained remission begins after the first 6 months, for an additional minimum of 6 months to assess later response. Discussion The SINAPPS2 trial aims to test whether immunotherapy is efficacious and safe in psychosis associated with anti-neuronal membrane antibodies. Trial registration ISRCTN, 11177045. Registered on 2 May 2017. EudraCT, 2016-000118-31. Registered on 22 November 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194815. Registered on 21 June 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3336-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.