Voicing perception for final stops was studied for impaired- and for normal-hearing listeners when cues in naturally spoken syllables were progressively neutralized. The syllables were ten different utterances of /daep, daek, daet, daeb, daeg, daed/ spoken in random order by a male. The cue modifications consisted progressively of neutralized vowel duration, equalized occlusion duration, burst deletion, murmur deletion, vowel-transition interchange, and transition deletion. The impaired subjects had moderate-to-severe losses and showed at least 70% correct voicing for the unmodified syllables. For the voiced stops, vowel-duration adjustment and murmur deletion each resulted in significant reductions in voicing perception for more than one-third of the impaired listeners; all normals showed good performance following neutralization of these cues. For the voiceless stops, large percentages of both listener groups showed decreased voicing perception due to the burst deletion, though a majority of both groups performed well above change even after the vowel-duration adjustment and the burst deletion. When the vowel off-going transitions were exchanged between cognate syllables in given pairs, the effect on voicing perception exhibited by many impaired- and all normal-hearing listeners implicated the vowel transitions as an important additional source of cues to final-stop voicing perception.

No abstract

Cues to the voicing distinction for final /f,s,v,z/ were assessed for 24 impaired- and 11 normal-hearing listeners. In base-line tests the listeners identified the consonants in recorded /d circumflex C/ syllables. To assess the importance of various cues, tests were conducted of the syllables altered by deletion and/or temporal adjustment of segments containing acoustic patterns related to the voicing distinction for the fricatives. The results showed that decreasing the duration of /circumflex/ preceding /v/ or /z/, and lengthening the /circumflex/ preceding /f/ or /s/, considerably reduced the correctness of voicing perception for the hearing-impaired group, while showing no effect for the normal-hearing group. For the normals, voicing perception deteriorated for /f/ and /s/ when the frications were deleted from the syllables, and for /v/ and /z/ when the vowel offsets were removed from the syllables with duration-adjusted vowels and deleted frications. We conclude that some hearing-impaired listeners rely to a greater extent on vowel duration as a voicing cue than do normal-hearing listeners.

Moderately to profoundly hearing-impaired (n = 30) and normal-hearing (n = 6) listeners identified [p, k, t, f, theta, s] in [symbol; see text], and [symbol; see text]s tokens extracted from spoken sentences. The [symbol; see text]s were also identified in the sentences. The hearing-impaired group distinguished stop/fricative manner more poorly for [symbol; see text] in sentences than when extracted. Further, the group's performance for extracted [symbol; see text] was poorer than for extracted [symbol; see text] and [symbol; see text]. For the normal-hearing group, consonant identification was similar among the syllable and sentence contexts.

The alveolar consonants /d, n, l/ occur frequently in intervocalic position in conversational speech but have received little study for differences in their acoustic cues. Impaired- and normal-hearing listeners were investigated for use of consonant-segment versus transition-segment cues to recognition of /d, n, l/ in /aeCae/ tokens extracted from sentences. To examine the cues' contribution to /d, n, l/ recognition, the segments were degraded singly or in combinations in the tokens as follows: [aeC] or [Cae] transitions were replaced by adjacent pitch periods from the respective vowels; the consonant segments were replaced by silence or by a synthetic consonant approximating the summed low-frequency spectra of the /d, n, l/ murmurs. The results with normal-hearing listeners showed that the presence of any one of the three segments, [aeC] transition, [Cae] transition, or natural consonant segment, supported a moderate to high level of /d, n, l/ recognition, depending on the phoneme. In contrast, the severely hearing-impaired listeners' consonant recognition was poor on the basis of transition information, but better in the presence of the natural consonants. The /aeCae/'s with the synthetic consonant yielded chance level performance for the hearing-impaired listeners but good consonant recognition for the normal-hearing listeners--a further indication that cues in the transitions were quite useful for the normal-hearing group but not for the hearing-impaired group.