PurposeMeasures of patient satisfaction are used in the assessment of quality of healthcare, but the influence of patient‐based factors on reported satisfaction has been little described. This paper aims to quantify associations between reported satisfaction with GP services and measures of socio‐demographic and health status and the effect of adjusting for these factors in comparing satisfaction measured at the level of primary care organisations (PCOs).Design/methodology/approachCross‐sectional analysis of the 1998 Welsh Health Survey, response rate 61 per cent. The 20,380 respondents, aged between 18 and 74 years reporting contact with their GP in the previous 12 months formed the study population. Satisfaction was defined as being “very” or “fairly satisfied” with GP services. Crude odds ratios were calculated(95 per cent confidence intervals) for reported satisfaction for the 22 PCOs in Wales and adjusted odds ratios were calculated for socio‐demographic variables and LLTI in logistic regression.FindingsSatisfaction varied with age, gender, employment status, marital status, and reported LLTI. The rank order of reported satisfaction for PCOs changed by up to five places after adjusting for these factors.Research limitations/implicationsThe generalisability of this study should be assessed through further research on the impact of adjusting for patient based factors when using other validated measures of satisfaction.Practical implicationsComparing measures of satisfaction between organisations to assess relative performance may not be valid unless differences in socio‐demographic composition are taken into account.Originality/valueHighlights the importance of caution in using measures of patient satisfaction to assess performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.