BackgroundIn‐hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major public health problem with significant mortality. A better understanding of where IHCA occurs in hospitals (intensive care unit [ICU] versus monitored ward [telemetry] versus unmonitored ward) could inform strategies for reducing preventable deaths.Methods and ResultsThis is a retrospective study of adult IHCA events in the Get with the Guidelines—Resuscitation database from January 2003 to September 2010. Unadjusted analyses were used to characterize patient, arrest, and hospital‐level characteristics by hospital location of arrest (ICU versus inpatient ward). IHCA event rates and outcomes were plotted over time by arrest location. Among 85 201 IHCA events at 445 hospitals, 59% (50 514) occurred in the ICU compared to 41% (34 687) on the inpatient wards. Compared to ward patients, ICU patients were younger (64±16 years versus 69±14; P<0.001) and more likely to have a presenting rhythm of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (21% versus 17%; P<0.001). In the ICU, mean event rate/1000 bed‐days was 0.337 (±0.215) compared with 0.109 (±0.079) for telemetry wards and 0.134 (±0.098) for unmonitored wards. Of patients with an arrest in the ICU, the adjusted mean survival to discharge was 0.140 (0.037) compared with the unmonitored wards 0.106 (0.037) and telemetry wards 0.193 (0.074). More IHCA events occurred in the ICU compared to the inpatient wards and there was a slight increase in events/1000 patient bed‐days in both locations.ConclusionsSurvival rates vary based on location of IHCA. Optimizing patient assignment to unmonitored wards versus telemetry wards may contribute to improved survival after IHCA.

No abstract

Background Expert guidelines for treatment of cardiac arrest recommend administration of epinephrine every three to five minutes. However, different dosing periods of epinephrine have not been systematically assessed. Objective We evaluated the association between epinephrine dosing frequency and survival to hospital discharge in adults with an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Methods Using data from 2000–2009 in the Get With the Guidelines(GWTG)-Resuscitation IHCA registry (formerly the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation [NRCPR]), we examined the association between epinephrine dosing period and survival to hospital discharge. Epinephrine dosing period was defined as the time between the first epinephrine dose and the resuscitation endpoint, divided by the total number of epinephrine doses received subsequent to the first epinephrine dose. Generalized estimating equations were used to construct multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for patient and arrest characteristics. Results Included were 20,909 eligible IHCA events from 505 GWTG-Resuscitation participating hospitals. Compared to an epinephrine dosing period of 4 to <5 minutes per dose, survival to hospital discharge was significantly higher in patients with an epinephrine dosing period of 6 to <10 minutes per dose: for 6 to <7 min/dose, adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.41 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.78); for 7 to <8 min/dose, adjusted OR, 1.30 (95%CI: 1.02, 1.65); for 8 to <9 min/dose, adjusted OR, 1.79 (95%CI: 1.38, 2.32); for 9 to <10 min/dose, adjusted OR, 2.17 (95%CI: 1.62, 2.92). This pattern was consistent for both shockable and non-shockable cardiac arrest rhythms. Moreover, for the majority (87%) of cardiac arrests due to non-shockable rhythms, an epinephrine dosing period of 1 to <3 minutes/dose was associated with lower rates of survival. Conclusion In this large, observational, national registry of in-hospital cardiac arrest, we found that epinephrine dosing at a less frequent dosing period than recommended by consensus guidelines was associated with improved survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Our findings suggest that clinical trials may be needed to determine the role and dose frequency of epinephrine in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest.