No abstract

Video is increasingly utilized by human rights groups as a component in their advocacy strategies. This article looks at how video is used for a range of local, national, and transnational human rights audiences—both traditional and alternative. Drawing on a case study from the Philippines, it considers the challenges and issues faced by WITNESS (www.witness.org), its locally based human rights partners, and other similar organizations as they create and use video as visual evidence, testimony, and moral story before local, international, and transnational human rights audiences. These challenges include the contextualization of stories and sight bites, dilemmas of moving testimony between advocacy and media arenas, and the difficulties of establishing an ethical relationship, a community of witness, at a distance. This article is written in a personal capacity, although it draws on my experiences working as Program Manager at WITNESS.

No abstract

Peter Gabriel and other allies created WITNESS nearly 20 years ago-shortly after the Rodney King incident in Los Angeles. At the time, our founders asked: 'What if every human rights worker had a camera in their hands? What would they be able to document? What would they be able to change?' Since 1992 WITNESS has engaged with the risks, opportunities and possibilities for action that emerge from the power of moving images-training and supporting human rights activists worldwide to create real change through our methodology of 'video advocacy'. Yet now an increasing number of people worldwide have cameras. Participants, witnesses and perpetrators are all filming. Videos (particularly mobile video) make it possible to document and publicize human rights struggles-from monks marching for freedom in Rangoon and the election protestors in Tehran, to individual voices speaking out against injustice on YouTube. However, despite the growing online circulation of images of human rights violations, of victims and survivors, there is limited discussion of crucial safety, consent and ethical concerns-particularly for people who are filmed. Issues around consent, representation and re-victimization and retaliation have emerged even more clearly in an open and networked online environment. Video is being reworked, remixed and recirculated by many more people. New possibilities for action by a global citizenry have arisen, but these carry with them real dangers. The human rights and technology communities can help lead the way in confronting these challenges. The article concludes with suggestions for approaches based on norms, technology solutions, and other ideas that could be deployed to begin to address these emerging issues. * Sam Gregory is a video producer, trainer, and human rights advocate. He is Program Director at WITNESS, which trains and supports people to use video in human rights advocacy. He has worked with human rights activists-particularly in Latin America and Asia, including the Philippines, Burma and Indonesia, integrating video into campaigns on human rights issues. He was lead editor of WITNESS's book Video for Change: A Guide for Advocacy and Activism (Pluto Press, 2005). He developed WITNESS's Video Advocacy Institute, an intensive two-week training program, and has taught on human rights advocacy using video at the Harvard Kennedy School.