asal airway obstruction (NAO) is a common presenting symptom in otolaryngology and facial plastic surgery practices. The potential for multiple contributing causes requires extensive evaluation. Many objective and subjective instruments are available to quantify the severity of the obstruction. One subjective quality-of-life instrument is the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. 1 The NOSE scale is a brief, valid, reliable, and responsive survey to measure disturbances in quality of life specific to nasal obstruction. The results of objective measures of obstruction and subjective NOSE scores correlate poorly. 2 As a consequence, many recent studies 3-6 use the NOSE survey as a primary outcome measure for surgical treatment of nasal obstruction. IMPORTANCE Nasal airway obstruction is a common presenting symptom in otolaryngology and facial plastic surgery practices, and the potential for multiple contributing causes requires extensive evaluation. OBJECTIVE To develop a classification system for nasal obstruction using a subjective, validated quality-of-life instrument. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective study of patients' responses on the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) instrument performed from July 2011 through May 2012. All patients were seen at a university-based tertiary medical center. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Scores from patients with or without nasal obstruction were used to develop a classification system after receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The classification subdivides nasal obstruction scores into a range of defined classes. RESULTS Data analysis was performed using results from 345 patients. A score of 30 on the NOSE survey best differentiated patients with and without nasal obstruction. This threshold also provided intervals used to define the other class ranges. Patients were categorized as having mild (range, 5-25), moderate (range, 30-50), severe (range, 55-75), or extreme (range, 80-100) nasal obstruction, depending on responses on the NOSE survey. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The NOSE scale is an important tool for gauging symptoms in patients with nasal obstruction. The proposed classification system will improve patient care by providing a framework for the severity of their symptoms and helping them understand potential treatment effects. If the classification is used in future outcomes research, it will allow physicians to better understand the study patient population and the effect of treatment on each severity class. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA

To measure the efficacy of functional rhinoplasty techniques with a validated quality-of-life instrument. Design: Prospective observational outcomes study of patients with severe nasal obstruction owing to septal deviation, internal or external valve collapse, and turbinate hypertrophy who subsequently underwent functional rhinoplasty. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were performed using the Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation scale. Results: Forty-one patients completed preoperative and postoperative evaluations. No complications occurred. There was a significant improvement in mean Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation score postoperatively for the entire cohort (PϽ.01). Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation scores were also examined based on the procedure performed, such as spreader grafting, septoplasty, external valve suspension, and turbinectomy. Each subgroup also demonstrated airway improvement. Conclusions: Functional rhinoplasty techniques are effective in improving nasal airway function as measured by a patient-based, disease-specific, quality-of-life instrument. The specific techniques considered to treat nasal obstruction can be tailored to address the areas of concern, including septal deviation, internal or external valve collapse, and turbinate hypertrophy.

IMPORTANCERhinoplasty is a common operation in which shape and function are intimately related, whether the procedure is cosmetic, functional, or combined in nature. There is currently no properly developed and validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate both functional and cosmetic components of rhinoplasty. OBJECTIVE To develop, validate, and field test the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) to evaluate both functional and cosmetic outcomes of rhinoplasty.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Survey development study between October 2016 and April 2017 in a tertiary referral facial plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic. Preoperative and postoperative adult patients undergoing rhinoplasty, whether cosmetic or reconstructive, were included. A fifth group of adult nonrhinoplasty patients (facial cosmetic or reconstructive) were also included for the field test.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Generated and reduced items, psychometric validation measures of the SCHNOS, and differences on scales between groups.RESULTS For survey development, a total of 18 patients and 5 experts were interviewed. Of these patients, 5 were male, and 13 were female. Their mean (SD) age was 38 (14.8) years (range, 20-64 years). Field testing included 191 patients (67% were women and the mean [SD] age was 41.5 [15.8] years). A total of 10 items were included after generation, cognitive interviews, and item reduction. The 10 items represent 2 domains: nasal obstruction (first 4 items) and nasal cosmesis (last 6 items). For both domains, Cronbach α was excellent: 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for obstruction and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) for cosmesis. Exploratory factor analysis using scree plots for each domain showed that the domains are unidimensional in nature with each domain evaluating what it is intended to assess (nasal obstruction and cosmesis). The factor loading estimates were high for all the items, varying from 0.74 to 0.92. Kruskal-Wallis testing showed a significance level of P < .001 when evaluating the difference between groups (preoperative cosmetic, postoperative cosmetic, preoperative functional, postoperative functional, and nonrhinoplasty) for all individual questions, composite scores, and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. Correlations between the obstruction composite score and the NOSE scores were r = 0.943 (P < .001), which is very strong. The obstruction and cosmesis composite scores were only weakly correlated (r = 0.388; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEWe have developed and validated a new PROM to evaluate both functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty patients. The domains of obstruction and cosmesis were found to be internally consistent and unidimensional. The SCHNOS provides a short, validated questionnaire that we recommend for use in all functional or cosmetic rhinoplasty patients.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.

Anterior septal reconstruction represents a powerful method for correction of nasal valve stenosis resulting from severe anterocaudal septal deviations.

Importance: Although conventional hump resections are a hallmark of rhinoplasty, there has been a rekindled interest in dorsal preservation (DP) techniques as a means for addressing the dorsal hump, with claims of superior functional and aesthetic results. As such, an understanding of DP, including technical considerations and outcomes, is imperative. Observations: DP allows for mobilization of the osseocartilaginous nasal vault as a single unit and thereby prevents disruption of the natural keystone area. The osseous nasal vault is managed with a transverse osteotomy and either a bilateral single lateral osteotomy (pushdown procedure) or bilateral bony wedge resections (letdown procedure) to allow for descent of the nasal dorsum. A variety of approaches to the septum exist, each differentiated by the location of cartilage resection: subdorsal, high-septal, midseptal, or inferior septum. These techniques result in pleasing dorsal aesthetic lines but may be limited by a higher rate of dorsal hump recurrence. Patency of the internal nasal valve (INV) is theoretically improved with DP. Robust series with patientreported outcomes are lacking, although several reports and early experience at our center with a newly described high-septal resection technique do suggest positive functional and cosmetic outcomes with DP. Conclusions and Relevance: With the recent revitalized interest in DP, an understanding of the potential benefits, techniques, and challenges associated with this surgery is helpful. Maintenance of the dorsum as a single unit has implications for maintaining structural integrity at the nasal keystone, pleasing dorsal aesthetic lines, and the patency of the INV. As surgeons continue to develop and employ these techniques, critical assessment of patient-reported outcomes and objective nasal measurements, with an emphasis on comparison with standard hump takedown techniques, will be valuable.