No abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) is very much a technology-driven treatment modality in the management of cancer. RT techniques have changed significantly over the past few decades, thanks to improvements in engineering and computing. We aim to highlight the recent developments in radiation oncology, focusing on the technological and biological advances. We will present state-of-the-art treatment techniques, employing photon beams, such as intensity-modulated RT, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body RT and adaptive RT, which make possible a highly tailored dose distribution with maximum normal tissue sparing. We will analyse all the steps involved in the treatment: imaging, delineation of the tumour and organs at risk, treatment planning and finally image-guidance for accurate tumour localisation before and during treatment delivery. Particular attention will be given to the crucial role that imaging plays throughout the entire process. In the case of adaptive RT, the precise identification of target volumes as well as the monitoring of tumour response/modification during the course of treatment is mainly based on multimodality imaging that integrates morphological, functional and metabolic information. Moreover, real-time imaging of the tumour is essential in breathing adaptive techniques to compensate for tumour motion due to respiration.Brief reference will be made to the recent spread of particle beam therapy, in particular to the use of protons, but also to the yet limited experience of using heavy particles such as carbon ions.Finally, we will analyse the latest biological advances in tumour targeting. Indeed, the effectiveness of RT has been improved not only by technological developments but also through the integration of radiobiological knowledge to produce more efficient and personalised treatment strategies.

In an era of personalized treatment, there is a great interest in identifying factors which might predict patient response to radiotherapy (RT). The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains still controversial. We performed a retrospective analysis on the prognostic value of EGFR in HNSCC patients treated with surgery and postoperative RT through a semiquantitative immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR membrane expression. We retrospectively analyzed 65 HNSCC patients treated in our Institute from 1997 to 2003 who underwent adjuvant RT after surgery. Median follow-up was 43.5 months (range 0.2-173 months). None of these patients were treated with postoperative concomitant chemotherapy. Tumor samples were obtained from surgical specimens. Membrane features (intensity, extension) of EGFR expression were evaluated, and a statistical analysis (univariate and multivariate) was conducted to correlate these parameters with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with an intense and complete labeling of EGFR presented worse OS and DFS compared with groups obtained by all other possible combination, and the difference was borderline statistically significant (P = 0.08 for OS and P = 0.006 for DFS). Moreover, a stratification of patients was performed considering EGFR expression on the tumor tissue and classifying its distribution as "homogeneous" or "heterogeneous." We found that patients showing an "heterogeneous" EGFR expression distribution had worse OS and DFS compared to the "homogeneous" group of patients. Based on our results, EGFR expression, especially referring to membrane features (semiquantitative analysis), might have a prognostic value for OS and DFS in locally advanced HNSCC treated with surgery and adjuvant RT. Prospective trials could be useful to confirm the prognostic role of EGFR expression and also to assess a predictive role to select that might benefit from more aggressive treatments.

Background: This study investigated the risk of reconstruction failure after mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction, and radiotherapy to either a temporary tissue expander or permanent implant. Methods: Records of women treated at a single institution between June of 1997 and December of 2011 were reviewed. Two patient groups were identified based on type of immediate breast reconstruction: tissue expander followed by exchange with a permanent implant and permanent implant. The study endpoint was rate of reconstruction failure, defined as a replacement, loss of the implant, or conversion to flap. Results: The tissue expander/permanent implant and the permanent implant groups consisted of 63 and 75 patients, respectively. The groups were well balanced for clinical and treatment characteristics. With a median follow-up of 116 months, eight implant losses, 50 implant replacements, and four flap conversions were recorded. Reconstruction failure occurred in 22 of 63 patients in the expander/implant group and in 40 of 75 patients in the permanent implant group. A traditional proportional hazards model showed a higher risk of reconstruction failure for the expander/implant group (hazard ratio, 2.01) and a significantly shorter time to reconstruction failure compared with the permanent implant group (109.2 months versus 157.7 months; p = 0.03); however, according to a competing risk model, the between-groups cumulative incidences were not significantly different (hazard ratio, 1.09). Conclusions: Radiotherapy to either a tissue expander or a permanent implant presented a fairly large risk of reconstruction failure over time. The expander/implant group was not more likely to develop reconstruction failure compared to permanent implant group, but the timing of onset was shorter. More complex techniques should be investigated to lower the risk of reconstruction failure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

IntroductionThe purpose of this multicenter, prospective, observational, open-label study was to evaluate the use and tolerability of dermo-cosmetic products in preventing skin reactions associated with cancer treatments.Patients and methodsA 12-product kit was supplied to patients before chemotherapy began and was to be used throughout the treatment phase. Cutaneous adverse events were evaluated at each treatment session. Physicians evaluated skin reactions (edema, erythema, dryness, desquamation, pigmentation disorders, and cracks) and gave their opinion on the skin benefit for patients at the end of the study. Patients also evaluated the product benefit using the Patient Benefit Index (PBI) questionnaire. Results were analyzed by subgroups of casual and regular users, based on number and frequency of products used.ResultsA total of 147 patients were enrolled in cancer services in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Canada. Mean age was 59 years with 71% being female. Product tolerance on whole body was rated good to excellent for at least 89% of the patients for each product. Aggravated skin reactions during the study were reported more frequently by casual users than regular users (39.5% versus 22%; p=0.029). Similarly, casual users reported more erythema aggravation (p=0.02) and desquamation (p=0.03) than regular users. PBI >1 was reported for 95.5% of patients and regular users had significantly higher scores than casual users (p=0.049).DiscussionOverall, the 12-product kit was very well tolerated, with regular users reporting benefits more frequently than casual users. Results support international recommendations to use appropriate skin care products to minimize the impact of cutaneous reactions associated with chemotherapy.