Despite advancements in prosthetic technologies, patients with amputation today suffer great diminution in mobility and quality of life. We have developed a modified below-knee amputation (BKA) procedure that incorporates agonist–antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs), which surgically preserve and couple agonist–antagonist muscle pairs for the subtalar and ankle joints. AMIs are designed to restore physiological neuromuscular dynamics, enable bidirectional neural signaling, and offer greater neuroprosthetic controllability compared to traditional amputation techniques. In this prospective, nonrandomized, unmasked study design, 15 subjects with AMI below-knee amputation (AB) were matched with 7 subjects who underwent a traditional below-knee amputation (TB). AB subjects demonstrated significantly greater control of their residual limb musculature, production of more differentiable efferent control signals, and greater precision of movement compared to TB subjects (P < 0.008). This may be due to the presence of greater proprioceptive inputs facilitated by the significantly higher fascicle strains resulting from coordinated muscle excursion in AB subjects (P < 0.05). AB subjects reported significantly greater phantom range of motion postamputation (AB: 12.47 ± 2.41, TB: 10.14 ± 1.45 degrees) when compared to TB subjects (P < 0.05). Furthermore, AB subjects also reported less pain (12.25 ± 5.37) than TB subjects (17.29 ± 10.22) and a significant reduction when compared to their preoperative baseline (P < 0.05). Compared with traditional amputation, the construction of AMIs during amputation confers the benefits of enhanced physiological neuromuscular dynamics, proprioception, and phantom limb perception. Subjects’ activation of the AMIs produces more differentiable electromyography (EMG) for myoelectric prosthesis control and demonstrates more positive clinical outcomes.

The brain undergoes marked changes in function and functional connectivity after limb amputation. The agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) amputation is a procedure that restores physiological agonist-antagonist muscle relationships responsible for proprioceptive sensory feedback to enable greater motor control. We compared results from the functional neuroimaging of individuals (n = 29) with AMI amputation, traditional amputation, and no amputation. Individuals with traditional amputation demonstrated a significant decrease in proprioceptive activity, measured by activation of Brodmann area 3a, whereas functional activation in individuals with AMIs was not significantly different from controls with no amputation (P < 0.05). The degree of proprioceptive activity in the brain strongly correlated with fascicle activity in the peripheral muscles and performance on motor tasks (P < 0.05), supporting the mechanistic basis of the AMI procedure. These results suggest that surgical techniques designed to restore proprioceptive peripheral neuromuscular constructs result in desirable central sensorimotor plasticity.

For persons with lower extremity (LE) amputation, acquisition of surface electromyography (sEMG) from within the prosthetic socket remains a significant challenge due to the dynamic loads experienced during the gait cycle. However, these signals are critical for both understanding the clinical effects of LE amputation and determining the desired control trajectories of active LE prostheses. Current solutions for collecting within-socket sEMG are generally (i) incompatible with a subject's prescribed prosthetic socket and liners, (ii) uncomfortable, and (iii) expensive. This study presents an alternative within-socket sEMG acquisition paradigm using a novel flexible and low-profile electrode. First, the practical performance of this Sub-Liner Interface for Prosthetics (SLIP) electrode is compared to that of commercial Ag/AgCl electrodes within a cohort of subjects without amputation. Then, the corresponding SLIP electrode sEMG acquisition paradigm is implemented in a single subject with unilateral transtibial amputation performing unconstrained movements and walking on level ground. Finally, a quantitative questionnaire characterizes subjective comfort for SLIP electrode and commercial Ag/AgCl electrode instrumentation setups. Quantitative analyses suggest comparable signal qualities between SLIP and Ag/AgCl electrodes while qualitative analyses suggest the feasibility of using the SLIP electrode for real-time sEMG data collection from load-bearing, ambulatory subjects with LE amputation.