There is a very high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, which is defined by a serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] of lower than 20 ng/mL, in all populations of the world. Unfortunately, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with intestinal malabsorption syndromes, including cystic fibrosis (CF), celiac disease (CD), short bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is higher than that in the general population, indicating the presence of disease-specific causative factors. In this review, we aimed to present clinical findings to highlight the roles of insufficient exposure to sunlight and inflammation in the development of vitamin D deficiency in patients with intestinal malabsorption syndromes. Furthermore, we aimed to present experimental evidence that supported a role of vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of IBD. Finally, we reviewed clinical intervention strategies aiming to normalize vitamin D status in and even to improve the conditions of patients and to discuss certain issues that needed to be addressed in future research.

While acute endometritis is a reasonably well-defined entity of ascending infection and attendant active inflammation, chronic endometritis is less well defined. As part of a broad effort to define and refine the diagnostic criteria and management of the disease, we conducted a survey of pathologists to understand the variability in diagnostic criteria and implications of the diagnosis of nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis. Members of national and international professional pathology societies were surveyed utilizing anonymous electronic surveys designed to examine diagnostic criteria, etiological understanding and treatment implications of a pathologic diagnosis of nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis. There was substantial variability among pathologists in the diagnostic criteria used for making a diagnosis of nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis, with 28.5% of pathologists using the presence of a single plasma cell for making the diagnosis. There was additional variability in the use of special stains, reporting in the presence of coexisting lesions and the hormonal stage of the endometrium. There were no differences between generalists and specialists in the diagnostic criteria used, except the significantly greater likelihood of specialists making the diagnosis in gestational endometrium. The substantial variability in diagnostic criteria for nonspecific, nonobstetric chronic endometritis among pathologists, including among gynecologic pathologists, has the potential to confound the management of patients. Standardization of diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis is essential to understand the implications of the diagnosis.