BackgroundSurface-modified flow diverters (FDs) designed to reduce thrombogenicity represent the next frontier for intracranial aneurysm treatment. The Derivo Embolization Device (DED) is a novel FD with titanium oxide and titanium oxynitride finishing of the struts. We performed a systematic review of pertinent literature, aiming to evaluate the device’s effectiveness and safety.MethodsA literature search of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.ResultsFive studies comprising 481 aneurysms were included. These studies were conducted in Turkey, Brazil, Germany, Poland, and Italy; two were prospective and three were retrospective. Twenty-six aneurysms (5.4%) were ruptured. The antiplatelet regimens were heterogeneous, but dual antiplatelet therapy was administered preprocedurally in all studies and maintained for 3–12 months before a switch to single antiplatelet therapy. The rate of periprocedural ischemic and hemorrhagic complications was 4.9% (95% CI 2.9% to 7%). Adjunctive coiling was used in 25.6% (95% CI 11.4% to 39.8%) of aneurysms. The complete angiographic occlusion rate was 81.4% (95% CI 71.3% to 91.5%), mortality rate was 2.1% (95% CI 0.4% to 3.9%), with follow-up ranging from 9 to 18 months. Delayed aneurysm rupture was reported in one patient.ConclusionsThe DED has been increasingly used in other countries. We identified low rates of periprocedural complications and mortality and a high rate of complete occlusion.
Background Surface modification of flow diverters (FDs) has been explored as a solution for reducing thrombotic risk of these devices, without necessarily using dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). If effective, this could pose a promising alternative for treatment of ruptured aneurysms not amenable to other modalities. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyzes guidelines. We included articles reporting use of surface-modified FDs for treatment of ruptured aneurysms. Demographics, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) severity, aneurysm characteristics, devices used, periprocedural complications, angiographic outcomes, and mortality were extracted for sample size-based weighted analysis. Results Six studies comprising 59 patients with 64 aneurysms were included. Mean patient age was 56.6 ± 6.3 years and 60.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.7–72.9%) were women. The anterior circulation was the location in 60.4% (95%CI, 45.5–73.5%) of aneurysms; 41.8% of the aneurysms were saccular (95%CI, 29.3–55.4%), 16.7% were fusiform (95%CI, 8.3–30.8%), 29.9% were dissecting (95%CI, 12.8–55.4%), 24.4% were blood-blister (95%CI, 15.2–36.7%), and 5.7% were mycotic (95%CI, 2–15.1%). Poor SAH grade was reported in 46.9% (95%CI, 33.3–60.9%). Adjunctive coiling was used in 33.2% (95%CI, 12.4–63.6%). Periprocedural thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications occurred in 20% (95%CI, 7.1–45.1%) and 8.8% (95%CI, 3.7–19.5%), respectively. Complete occlusion was achieved in 76.4% (95%CI, 58.1–88.3%); no retreatments during follow-up were reported. Overall mortality was 15.1% (95%CI, 7.7–27.6%). There were no differences between single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) and DAPT regimens with respect to periprocedural thromboembolic complications ( P = 0.09), hemorrhagic ( P = 0.834) complications, and mortality ( P = 0.312). Conclusion Surface-modified FD treatment of ruptured aneurysms resulted in high rates of thromboembolic complications and acceptable rates of hemorrhagic complications. A considerable proportion of aneurysms were nonsaccular. Rates of complete occlusion were high and retreatment were low. Importantly, no statistically significant difference was found between SAPT and DAPT with respect to complications and mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.