Emerging adulthood provides an extended period during which potential career identities can be explored and feedback obtained before making a commitment. We tested an identity control theory model of the self-regulatory responses that emerging adults might make to negative feedback regarding their career identity. We surveyed 335 Australian emerging adults (mean age 19.28 years; 64% male) on negative career-related feedback, career-related goal discrepancy, career-related distress, career exploration, and identity defense. Consistent with theory, we found that more negative feedback was associated with greater perceived discrepancy between career goals and progress being made, which, in turn, was associated with greater distress. Distress was related to self-regulatory outcomes of identity defense and career exploration. The relationship was stronger for identity defense than for exploration. While defending might enable the current identity standard to be preserved, it might not be the most suitable response when the career goals are unsuitable or unobtainable.
This Special Issue is a collaborative project on the study of sport and failure. In dialogue with a range of works, queries, objects of study, and fields, these interdisciplinary sports studies scholars use a variety of approaches to ground and provide innovative critical entanglements to understand how sports types, players, cultures, worlds, and industries create, reproduce, and resist dominant ideas and structures. Collectively, these authors consider how sporting failures can articulate a “counterhegemonic discourse of losing” that challenges a world obsessed with power, prestige, privilege, and various other articulations of success. In this Issue, the authors explore how failure can catalyze acts of liberation from and resistance to restrictive and unequal modes of being in “societies structured in dominance.” Failure in this capacity can help to imagine alternatives to hegemonic norms, structures, and identities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.