Purpose Cancer is one of the leading causes of death, and thus, the scientific community has but great efforts to improve cancer management. Among the major challenges in cancer management is development of agents that can be used for early diagnosis and effective therapy. Conventional cancer management frequently lacks accurate tools for detection of early tumors and has an associated risk of serious side effects of chemotherapeutics. The need to optimize therapeutic ratio as the difference with which a treatment affects cancer cells versus healthy tissues lead to idea that it is needful to have a treatment that could act a the “magic bullet”—recognize cancer cells only. Nanoparticle platforms offer a variety of potentially efficient solutions for development of targeted agents that can be exploited for cancer diagnosis and treatment. There are two ways by which targeting of nanoparticles can be achieved, namely passive and active targeting. Passive targeting allows for the efficient localization of nanoparticles within the tumor microenvironment. Active targeting facilitates the active uptake of nanoparticles by the tumor cells themselves. Methods Relevant English electronic databases and scientifically published original articles and reviews were systematically searched for the purpose of this review. Results In this report, we present a comprehensive review of literatures focusing on the active targeting of nanoparticles to cancer cells, including antibody and antibody fragment-based targeting, antigen-based targeting, aptamer-based targeting, as well as ligand-based targeting. Conclusion To date, the optimum targeting strategy has not yet been announced, each has its own advantages and disadvantages even though a number of them have found their way for clinical application. Perhaps, a combination of strategies can be employed to improve the precision of drug delivery, paving the way for a more effective personalized therapy.

Abstract.Cancer remains the one of the most common causes of mortality in humans; thus, cancer treatment is currently a major focus of investigation. Researchers worldwide have been searching for the optimal treatment (the 'magic bullet') that will selectively target cancer, without afflicting significant morbidity. Recent advances in cancer nanotechnology have raised exciting opportunities for specific drug delivery by an emerging class of nanotherapeutics that may be targeted to neoplastic cells, thereby offering a major advantage over conventional chemotherapeutic agents. There are two ways by which targeting of nanoparticles may be achieved, namely passive and active targeting. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on passive targeting.

Purpose-This study aimed to assess the association between pretreatment c-Met overexpression in local-regional advanced cervical cancer patients treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and treatment outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant metastases control (DM), and local-regional control (LC).Patients and Methods-This IRB approved study included cervical cancer patients treated definitively and consecutively with CRT. Evaluation of cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for c-Met was performed and scored semi-quantitatively by three pathologists, blinded to the treatment outcomes, and incorporated both the intensity and percentage of immunoreactivity in invasive

This work compares intravenous (IV) versus fluoroscopy-guided transarterial intra-catheter (IC) delivery of iron oxide core-titanium dioxide shell nanoparticles (NPs) in vivo in VX2 model of liver cancer in rabbits. NPs coated with glucose and decorated with a peptide sequence from cortactin were administered to animals with developed VX2 liver cancer. Two hours after NPs delivery tumors, normal liver, kidney, lung and spleen tissues were harvested and used for a series on histological and elemental analysis tests. Quantification of NPs in tissues was done both by bulk inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis and by hard X-ray fluorescence microscopy. Both IV and IC NPs injection are feasible modalities for delivering NPs to VX2 liver tumors with comparable tumor accumulation. It is possible that this is an outcome of the fact that VX2 tumors are highly vascularized and hemorrhagic, and therefore enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) plays the most significant role in accumulation of nanoparticles in tumor tissue. It is, however, interesting to note that IV delivery led to increased sequestration of NPs by spleen and normal liver tissue, while IC delivery lead to more NP positive Kupffer cells. This difference is most likely a direct outcome of blood flow dynamics. Armed with this knowledge about nanoparticle delivery, we plan to test them as radiosensitizers in the future.

Ciprofloxacin biodegradable implantable matrices (CPX-IMs) of tailored porous surfaces were fabricated by hot melt injection molding of poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) followed by coating with PLLA/sodium chloride. CPX-IDs were designed to have a non-porous coat (NPC) or a porous coat of small pore size (SPC; 150-250 µm) or a large pore size (LPC; 250-350 µm). CPX-IMs surface pore size was confirmed by scanning electron microscope. The hardness of NPC, LPC, and SPC CPX-IMs were 58 ± 2.8, 53 ± 1.9, and 50 ± 2.1 N, respectively. The measured porosity values were 41.2 ± 1.53, 65.2 ± 1.1, and 60.7 ± 1.2%, respectively. Differential scanning calorimetry was employed to study the compatibility of ingredients, the effect of injection molding on polymer properties, and implants degradation. Coating of CPX-IMs prolonged drug release to reach a value of 90% release in 40 days. Antibacterial activity tests showed sufficiency of CPX to inhibit pathogens known to cause osteomyelitis. The in vivo study showed tissue compatibilities of the inserted matrices in tested rats with no sign of infection throughout the experiment period. SPC and LPC CPX-IMs demonstrated a better osteointegration, cell adhesion, and infiltration of different types of bone cells within implants structure compared to the non-porous matrix. Furthermore, LPC CPX-IMs showed a superior bone cell attachment and osteointegration relative to SPC CPX-IMs. Findings of this study confirmed the impact of porosity and pore sizes on cell proliferation and fracture healing concurrently with the sustained local antibiotic therapy for treatment or prevention of osteomyelitis.