Soil traces are useful as forensic evidence due to their potential to transfer and adhere to different types of surfaces on a range of objects or persons. Several works have been developed in forensic soils, under different analytical approaches. However, in Brazil, only the researches from the Group of the Federal University of Paraná have developed works with soils under a forensic approach. Focus has been given on the sequential chemical analyses and mineralogical techniques once they presented a large potential to discriminate soil samples, even that originated from the same bedrock. In this way, this work aimed to test a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for forensic soil sampling and an analytical protocol in Brazil between the academy and the scientific police through a blind simulated crime scene scenario. Samples were collected at four sites located in the Curitiba Metropolitan Region. All soils were classified as Inceptisol (Cambissolo), and the parent material in Curitiba is claystone and in Colombo is limestone. Around 3 g of sample composed by silt + clay fraction were isolated and analyzed by sequential chemical procedure: i) extraction of poorly ordered iron and aluminum oxides with ammonium oxalate (AO); ii) extraction of crystalline iron oxides with sodium dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB); and iii) extraction of poorly ordered aluminosilicates and gibbsite with NaOH 0.5 mol L -1 . All data were transformed by square root and formed a data matrix subsequently analyzed in a principal component analysis (PCA). Most of the samples were properly grouped according to their provenance at all four sites tested, showing the potential of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in a real crime scene. The sampling procedures presented in the SOP were detailed enough to allow the appropriate police work in forensic cases in any part of Brazil. As future considerations, modifications to the sample treatment and analytical protocol could be made depending on the context of the forensic work. Intense anthropogenic activities, such as domestic waste disposal in urban areas, would potentially reduce the discrimination power of such a proposed chemical analytical protocol.

No abstract

No abstract

Soils are a complex mixture with a variety of mineralogical, chemical, biological and physical properties, which can be explored within forensic case work. This study aimed to apply energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic techniques to discriminate soil samples collected in southern Brazil in a forensic context. Four replicates of soil were collected at four sites: two sites from the same parent material (claystone) and two other sites from limestone and granite/gneiss respectively. The physical and chemical (organic and mineral composition) and spectroscopic techniques (EDXRF and FTIR) produced 16 quantitative variables from only 2 g of sample. The main results from a forensic context were the separation of the soils collected from close neighbourhoods developed on the same parent material and the separation of soils collected in the A and B horizons of the same soil profile. The highest degree of similarity in the clustering of samples collected at the same site was 98.6% (B horizon in claystone domain). In addition to the parent material, the effect of organic matter on the chemical and mineralogical characteristics of the A horizon was important in the grouping dynamics of samples. This work demonstrated the potential of spectroscopic techniques in a forensic context.

Soil traces can be used as evidence in criminal investigations due their transferability, great variability and persistence. The soil samples originated from a crime scene that occurred in the Curitiba Metropolitan Region, Brazil. Physical, chemical and mineralogical analyses were carried out on the soil samples. All results were statistically analysed using multivariate analysis (PCA) to verify the relative positioning of soil traces which had been recovered from a stolen safety deposit box (SDB) from a vehicle suspected of being used in the SDB transportation, and from the site allegedly used in the opening of the SDB. The methods employed were effective in discriminating between the sampling sites. The soil from the site used in the opening of the SDB could be excluded as being the location where the soil transferred to the SDB had originated as it was different in many characteristics.Supplementary material: The organic matter content of the samples, and their gibbsite and kaolinite values obtained by thermogravimety analysis (S1), and X-ray diffraction patterns of the silt + clay fractions (S2) are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4561004