RESUMOA utilização no Brasil de sistemas tipo wetlands construídos no tratamento de águas residuárias iniciou no ano de 1980, intensificando-se a partir do ano 2000. O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar um estado da arte da aplicação no Brasil dos wetlands construídos de escoamento subsuperficial de fluxo horizontal (WCFH), identificando parâmetros de projeto e dados operacionais.Aborda-se, inicialmente, uma classificação para os wetlands construídos, seguido dos parâmetros de projeto e operação dos WCFH, destacando os diferentes critérios de dimensionamento, tais como os modelos oriundos da cinética de primeira ordem aplicável aos reatores tipo pistão, a relação de área per capita, o carregamento orgânico superficial e a taxa hidráulica, bem como a composição das unidades de tratamento e as macrófitas empregadas. Palavras Revisão de LiteraturaExperiências brasileiras com wetlands construídos aplicados ao tratamento de águas residuárias: parâmetros de projeto para sistemas horizontais Initially a classification for constructed wetlands is given, followed by design parameters and operational conditions for HFCW, highlighting different project criteria, e.g. models from first order kinetics for tubular piston reactors, the relation of superficial area per person, the organic superficial loading and the hydraulic loading, as well as the composition of units and macrophytes utilised.

No abstract

This paper evaluates constructed wetlands and sand filter technologies applied as onsite post-treatment of anaerobic effluent, under environmental conditions of Southern Brazil. Three different onsite systems were evaluated, as follow: onsite system 1 (septic tank – ST followed by horizontal flow constructed wetlands – HFCW) with five years operation; onsite system 2 (ST followed by sand filter – SF) with three years operation and onsite system 3 (anaerobic pond – AP followed by vertical flow constructed wetland – VFCW) with one year operation. HFCW shows an average potential removal of 82, 84, 16, 50 and 90% of chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), NH4+-N, PO43−-P and SS, respectively. Clogging phenomena occurred in the HFCW after three years operations with an average of 11 gSS m−2 d−1 loading rate applied. SF shows an average potential removal of 83, 88, 73, 76 and 88% of COD, BOD, NH4+-N, PO43−-P and SS, respectively. VFCH shows an average potential removal of 72, 80, and 71% of COD, NH4+-N, and SS, respectively, and also a very good nitrification (25 mgNO3−-N L−1 in the treated effluent) considering the high average COD loading rate (41 gCOD m−2 d−1) and average SS loading rate (15 gSS m−2 d−1) applied.

No abstract

No abstract