Background The effects of interferon-based therapies for hepatitis C virus (HCV) upon the risk of diabetes are controversial. The effects of newer, directly acting antiviral agents (DAA) upon this risk are unknown. We sought to determine the effects of HCV treatment upon the risk and incidence of diabetes. Methods Using the Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV Infected Veterans (ERCHIVES) database for persons with chronic HCV infection (n = 242 680), we identified those treated with a pegylated interferon and ribavirin regimen (PEG/RBV, n = 4764) or a DAA-containing regimen (n = 21 279), after excluding those with diabetes at baseline, those with a human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B virus coinfection, and those treated with both PEG/RBV and DAA regimens. Age-, race-, sex-, and propensity score–matched controls (1:1) were also identified. Results Diabetes incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 20.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.6–21.6) among untreated persons, 19.8 (95% CI 18.3–21.4) among those treated with PEG/RBV, and 9.89 (95% CI 8.7–11.1) among DAA-treated persons (P < .001). Among the treated, rates were 13.3 (95% CI 12.2–14.5) for those with a sustained virologic response (SVR) and 19.2 (95% CI 17.4–21.1) for those without an SVR (P < .0001). A larger reduction was observed in persons with more advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis (absolute difference 2.9 for fibrosis severity score [FIB-4] < 1.25; 5.7 for FIB-4 1.26–3.25; 9.8 for FIB-4 >3.25). DAA treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% CI .46–.63) and SVR (HR 0.81, 95% CI .70–.93) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of diabetes. DAA-treated persons had longer diabetes-free survival rates, compared to untreated and PEG/RBV-treated persons. There was no significant difference in diabetes-free survival rates between untreated and PEG/RBV-treated persons. The results were similar in inverse probability of treatment and censoring weight models. Conclusions DAA therapy significantly reduces the incidence and risk of subsequent diabetes. Treatment benefits are more pronounced in persons with more advanced liver fibrosis.

Background: There are scant data regarding hepatitis C (HCV) virologic response to directly acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in chronic hepatitis B (HBV) and HCV coinfected persons. HCV treatment response in those with spontaneously cleared HBV infection is unknown. Methods: All HCV infected persons treated with a DAA regimen in ERCHIVES were identified and categorized into HBV/HCV-coinfected (HBsAg, HBV DNA or both positive), HCV-monoinfected, and resolved HBV (isolated HBcAb+). SVR rates were determined and compared for all groups. Logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with SVR. Results: Among 115 HCV/HBV-coinfected, 38,570 HCV-monoinfected persons, and 13,096 persons with resolved HBV, 31.6% of HCV/HBV-coinfected, 24.6% of HCV-monoinfected and 26.4% with resolved HBV had cirrhosis at baseline. SVR was achieved in 90.4% of HCV/HBV-coinfected, 83.4% of HCV-monoinfected and 84.5% of those with resolved HBV infection (P = 0.04 HCV/HBV vs. HCV monoinfected). In a logistic regression model, those with HCV/HBV were more likely to achieve SVR compared with HCV monoinfected (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.17, 4.31). For HCV/HBV coinfected, the SVR rates dropped numerically with increasing severity of liver fibrosis (P-value non-significant). Factors associated with a lower likelihood of attaining SVR included cirrhosis at baseline (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80, 0.92), diabetes (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87, 0.99) and higher pre-treatment HCV RNA (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.87). Conclusion: HBV/HCV-coinfected persons have higher overall SVR rates with newer DAA regimens. Though not statistically significant, the virologic response is graded, with decreasing SVR rates with increasing degree of liver fibrosis as determined by the FIB-4 scores.

For persons with baseline Fibrosis-4 1.46–3.25, cirrhosis incidence/1000 patient-years was 49.3 among hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected and 18.2 among HCV monoinfected (P = .03). Cirrhosis risk was numerically higher but statistically nonsignificant among HBV/HCV coinfected (hazards ratio [HR] 1.51; 95% confidence intervals [CI], .37–6.05) but lower among those who attained sustained virologic response (HR, .52; 95% CI, .42–.63).

Objectives: To compare the outcome of nebulized epinephrine versus salbutamol for the management of children presenting with bronchiolitis. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Pediatrics, Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad. Period: 6 month (1st October, 2016 to 1st April, 2017). Material & Methods: Children fulfilled selection criteria were enrolled. Then patients were randomly divided in two groups by using lottery method. In Group A, children received salbutamol. In group B, children received nebulized adrenaline. After 48 hours, children were evaluated for heart rate, respiratory rates, oxygen saturation and Respiratory Distress Assessment Index (RDAI) score. All the information was collected using proforma. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 21. Results: The mean age of children was 10.45±6.70 months in epinephrine group and13.07±6.28 months in salbutamol group. There were 29 (52.7%) males & 26 (47.3%) females in both groups. After 48 hours, mean heart rate was 122.58±4.75bpm with epinephrine while 127.87±4.4.44bpm with salbutamol. Mean respiratory rate was 35.16±3.29bpm with epinephrine while 39.84±3.32bpm with salbutamol. Mean RDAI score was 8.35±1.36 with epinephrine while 10.07±1.37 with salbutamol. Mean oxygen saturation was 85.24±2.74% with epinephrine while 80.38±3.26% with salbutamol. The difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Thus the nebulized epinephrine was found to be more effective in maintaining heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation and RDAI score of children as compared to salbutamol.