The outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China and its declaration as a global pandemic by WHO has left the medical community under significant pressure to rapidly identify effective therapeutic and preventative strategies. Chloroquine (CQ) and its analogue hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were found to be efficacious against SARS-CoV-2 when investigated in preliminary in vitro experiments. Reports of success in early clinical studies were widely publicised by news outlets, politicians and on social media. These results led several countries to approve the use of these drugs for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Despite having reasonable safety profiles in the treatment of malaria and certain autoimmune conditions, both drugs are known to have potential cardiotoxic side effects. There is a high incidence of myocardial injury and arrhythmia reported with COVID-19 infection, and as such this population may be more susceptible to this side-effect profile. Studies to date have now demonstrated that in patients with COVID-19, these drugs are associated with significant QTc prolongation, as well as reports of ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, subsequent studies have failed to demonstrate clinical benefit from either drug. Indeed, clinical trials have also been stopped early due to safety concerns over HCQ. There is an urgent need for credible solutions to the global pandemic, but we argue that in the absence of high-quality evidence, there needs to be greater caution over the routine use or authorisation of drugs for which efficacy and safety is unproven.

Abstract. The preparation of sterile parenteral products requires careful control of all ingredients, materials, and processes to ensure the final product has the identity and strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics that it purports to possess. Contamination affecting these critical properties of parenteral products can occur in many ways and from many sources. The use of closures supplied by manufacturers in a ready-to-use state can be an effective method for reducing the risk of contamination and improving the quality of the drug product. This article will address contamination attributable to elastomeric container closure components and the regulatory requirements associated with container closure systems. Possible contaminants, including microorganisms, endotoxins, and chemicals, along with the methods by which these contaminants can enter the product will be reviewed. Such methods include inappropriate material selection, improper closure preparation processes, compromised container closure integrity, degradation of closures, and leaching of compounds from the closures.

Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias. AEDs and ICDs use shock advice algorithms to classify ECG tracings as shockable or non-shockable rhythms in clinical practice. Machine learning algorithms have recently been assessed for shock decision classification with increasing accuracy. Outside of rhythm classification alone, they have been evaluated in diagnosis of causes of cardiac arrest, prediction of success of defibrillation and rhythm classification without the need to interrupt cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This review explores the many applications of machine learning in AEDs and ICDs. While these technologies are exciting areas of research, there remain limitations to their widespread use including high processing power, cost and the ‘black-box’ phenomenon.

Background  Coronary arterial fistulae are rare yet have been associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We present a patient who was found to have a left circumflex (LCx) to left ventricular (LV) fistula in combination with apical HCM. Case summary  A 72-year-old female presented with syncope after exercise. She sustained facial injuries including fracture of her nasal bones. There were no previous episodes, no cardiac history, and she denied chest pain or anginal symptoms. Electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm with T-wave inversion throughout the chest leads. Echocardiography suggested apical HCM with hypertrophy of the LV apex but good systolic function. This was confirmed on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a characteristically spade-shaped LV cavity. Coronary angiography demonstrated a distal LCx to LV fistula from the apical hypertrophy but no coronary artery disease. She was started on beta-blockers and has had no further episodes, remaining well. Discussion  Coronary fistulae are present in 0.002% of the population but clinical outcomes are poorly understood. The majority are asymptomatic but anginal chest pains can occur through the ‘coronary steal’ phenomenon. Apical HCM is a subtype of HCM characterized by spade-shaped LV cavity obliteration. It is unclear whether the association between fistulae and HCM occur because of the increased vascularization and fibrosis associated with HCM or whether congenital malformation leads to hypertrophy. Both can produce a constellation of cardiac symptoms. Our patient has the previously unreported combination of apical HCM and an LCx fistula; two rarer subtypes of rare conditions appearing together.

No abstract