BACKGROUND
Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has demonstrated excellent diagnostic and prognostic value in single-center studies.
OBJECTIVES
This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of stress CMR and downstream costs from subsequent cardiac testing in a retrospective multicenter study in the United States.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, consecutive patients from 13 centers across 11 states who presented with a chest pain syndrome and were referred for stress CMR were followed for a target period of 4 years. The authors associated CMR findings with a primary outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction using competing risk-adjusted regression models and downstream costs of ischemia testing using published Medicare national payment rates.
RESULTS
In this study, 2,349 patients (63 ± 11 years of age, 47% female) were followed for a median of 5.4 years. Patients with no ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR, observed in 1,583 patients (67%), experienced low annualized rates of primary outcome (<1%) and coronary revascularization (1% to 3%), across all years of study follow-up. In contrast, patients with ischemia+/LGE+ experienced a >4-fold higher annual primary outcome rate and a >10-fold higher rate of coronary revascularization during the first year after CMR. Patients with ischemia and LGE both negative had low average annual cost spent on ischemia testing across all years of follow-up, and this pattern was similar across the 4 practice environments of the participating centers.
CONCLUSIONS
In a multicenter U.S. cohort with stable chest pain syndromes, stress CMR performed at experienced centers offers effective cardiac prognostication. Patients without CMR ischemia or LGE experienced a low incidence of cardiac events, little need for coronary revascularization, and low spending on subsequent ischemia testing. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS]: A Society for Cardiovascular Resonance Registry Study;
NCT03192891
)
In patients with late-presenting, unreduced elbow dislocation occurring up to 6 months earlier, open reduction is effective in restoring the joint to a painless, stable and functional state.
Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)-a preliminary report BCRL-is a chronic debilitating condition which impairs quality of life of breast cancer survivors. The aim is to study the feasibility of preventing lymphedema by performing BLymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA).^Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery with complete nodal dissection were taken up for the study. After the standard axillary nodal dissection, lymphatics were identified by the help of blue dye and were anastomosed with a tributary to the axillary vein. Post-operatively, patients were followed up clinically for development of lymphedema and lymphoscintigraphy was performed after treatment completion. A total of 35 patients were enrolled for the study. The average BMI was 29.5. LYMPHA was feasible in all cases. The number of lymphatics identified was 1 to 5 per axilla. Two patients developed transient lymphedema which resolved with conservative therapy and patients were able to discontinue the compression garment. Follow-up lymphoscintigraphy is performed in two patients, which showed normal lymphatic flow. LYMPHA is a feasible technique, not difficult to perform, takes a short time, is accomplished in same general anesthesia as for axillary dissection, and gives no extra scar. The early results are promising and long-term follow-up may make the procedure as a routine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.