BK virus (BKV) is an important pathogen and cause of nephropathy in renal transplant recipients, but its significance following hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is less well described. We measured blood and urine BKV in 124 allogeneic HSCT patients (67 had undergone prior HSCT [surveillance cohort]; 57 were monitored from transplant day 0 [prospective cohort]). BK viruria was manifest in 64.8% of the patients; 16.9% developed viremia. In the prospective cohort, the median time from transplantation to BK viremia development (128 days) was longer than for viruria (24 days; P < 0.0001). Among clinical factors (gender, disease, transplant type, alemtuzumab use, CMV viremia, GVHD, donor HLA C7 allele), only CMV viremia was more common in patients with BKV infection (P ≤ 0.04). There was a direct relationship between blood and urine BKV levels and the occurrence, and degree, of hematuria (P ≤ 0.03). Finally, BKV infection was analyzed along with other clinical factors in relation to the development of post-HSCT renal impairment. On multivariate analysis, only BK viremia (P = 0.000002) and alternative-donor transplantation (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of development of post-HSCT renal impairment, with BK viremia associated with a median 1.62 mg/dL rise in creatinine from the pre-transplant baseline. Among eight patients in the surveillance cohort with BK viremia, two developed biopsy-proven BKV nephropathy requiring hemodialysis. Investigation of whether prophylaxis against, or treatment of, BKV in the post-HSCT setting mitigates the associated morbidities, especially kidney injury, warrants prospective evaluation.

The financial impact of generic drug competition can be dramatic, but significant differences in regulatory and development processes between generics and biosimilars limit such comparisons and likely present significant challenges for biosimilar approval and adoption in the US market. However, a value-based care environment and their cost-savings potential make biosimilars an attractive option for the therapeutic arsenal. Oncologists' understanding of biosimilars is critical to moving forward.

HSCT patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, who have been exposed to vancomycin subsequent to surveillance culture positivity, have had prolonged neutropenia of >30 days, or first surveillance culture positive at week 1 of admission are potential candidates for early implementation of anti-VRE therapy when a gram-positive bacteremia is suspected.

Oral antineoplastic agents provide convenience to the patient, but are accompanied by challenges distinct from parenteral cancer treatment. Challenges include a more complex pharmacokinetic profile, with food influencing the absorption of many agents. Standards for evaluating and labeling prandial implications on oral chemotherapy are inconsistent; studies to determine food effects should be conducted early, and potentially often, during drug development with standardization on how rational fasting or fed recommendations are presented in the package insert (PI).

PURPOSE: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to replenish immunoglobulins in hypogammaglobulinemia (HG) caused by hematologic malignancies (HM) or their treatment (autologous stem-cell transplantation [ASCT] and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy [CAR-T]), in an effort to reduce the risk of infections. However, there is limited evidence to support this use, and IVIG supplies are limited and shortages are common. METHODS: An IVIG stewardship program (ISP) was implemented with the following requirements for IVIG administration: immunoglobulin G (IgG) level < 400 mg/dL (corrected for paraprotein) for post-ASCT and post–CAR-T patients, or IgG < 400 mg/dL with a history of a bacterial infection within the preceding 3 months for those with HM. Comparisons of the amount of IVIG administered, the incidence of infections, and the use of antimicrobials were performed between the 3 months before ISP and the 3 months after ISP. RESULTS: IVIG administered for HG decreased from 4,902 g in 86 patients before ISP to 1,777 g in 55 patients after ISP, a cost savings of $44,700. Adherence to ISP guidelines was 80%. Compared with before ISP, patients who stopped receiving IVIG after ISP had lower nadir IgG, fewer infections/patient-months, less antimicrobial usage, and a lower hospitalization rate for infection; no deaths occurred. Compared with before ISP, patients receiving IVIG after ISP had lower predose IgG and fewer infections/patient-months; the antibiotic usage, hospitalization rate for infection, and deaths from infection remained stable. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first ISP to lead to a dramatic decrease in IVIG usage with high adherence, primarily by selecting out patients at low risk of infection after IVIG discontinuation. Such an ISP is replicable and warrants adoption.