No abstract

Background: Insomnia is common in patients with major depressive disorder. Although antidepressants improve mood, insomnia often persists as a result of physiological hyperarousal. The orexin-2 receptor is increasingly being recognized as a new target for the treatment of persistent insomnia in major depressive disorder . Aim: This exploratory study investigated the effects of seltorexant on objective sleep parameters and subjective depressive symptoms in antidepressant treated major depressive disorder patients with persistent insomnia. Methods: Twenty male and female patients received a single dose of 10, 20, 40 mg seltorexant and placebo with a washout period of seven days in a double-blind four-way crossover study. Effects on latency to persistent sleep, total sleep time and sleep efficiency were assessed with polysomnography. Subjective changes in mood were explored by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report. Safety was recorded and suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed with the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Results: Latency to persistent sleep was significantly shorter for all doses of seltorexant compared to placebo. Placebo least square mean was 61.05 min with least square mean ratios treatment/placebo (80% confidence interval) of 0.32 (0.24–0.44), 0.15 (0.11–0.2) and 0.17 (0.12–0.23) 19.69, 9.2, 10.15 for 10, 20 and 40 mg seltorexant respectively, (all p<0.001). Total sleep time was significantly longer for all doses of seltorexant compared to placebo. Sleep efficiency was significantly improved. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report demonstrated a trend to mood-improvement for the 40 mg group. Conclusions: Seltorexant showed a statistically significant, dose-dependent decrease in latency to persistent sleep, and increase in total sleep time and sleep efficiency combined with a tendency toward subjectively improved mood.

Use of hypnotics is often associated with next-morning residual effects and a higher risk of motor vehicle accidents. Measuring next-morning effects on driving performance is therefore advised by regulatory agencies. Here, we examined driving performance following administration of daridorexant, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist developed to treat insomnia. Sixty healthy male and female subjects (50-79 years of age) were randomized in a placebo-and active-controlled, four-way cross-over study. Each subject received evening administration of daridorexant 50 and 100 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo, in separate treatment phases of 4 days. Simulated driving performance was assessed after initial (day 2) and repeated dosing (day 5), 9 hours postdose. Standard deviation of the lateral position (SDLP) was the main outcome. On both days, with zopiclone, SDLP increased significantly compared with placebo, which confirmed sensitivity of the simulator. With daridorexant, on day 2, the placebo-corrected mean (97.5% confidence interval) SDLP increased by 2.19 cm (0.46-3.93) and 4.43 cm (2.72-6.15) for 50 and 100 mg, respectively. On day 5, SDLP values for both daridorexant doses were significantly below the prespecified threshold of impairment (2.6 cm) and statistically not different from placebo. Daridorexant showed a lower self-rated driving quality and higher effort compared to placebo on day 2 but not on day 5. In non-insomnia subjects, daridorexant impaired simulated driving after initial but not after repeated dosing. Subjects should be cautioned about driving until they know how daridorexant affects them.

Background: The dual orexin receptor antagonist ACT-541468 showed sedative pharmacodynamic effects during initial clinical testing in adult subjects. The present study explored pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability in healthy elderly subjects. Methods: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, single-ascending dose study in 24 male/female elderly (65–80 years, 5, 15 and 25 mg in the morning, 6/2 active/placebo per group). Additionally, 10 subjects (8/2 active/placebo) received 25 mg for 7 days in the evening. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (saccadic peak velocity, adaptive tracking, body sway, visual analogue scales according to Bowdle and Bond and Lader, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and tolerability were assessed. In particular, pharmacodynamics results are to be interpreted exploratorily. Results: Absorption was quick with a median time to maximum concentration of ∼ 1.0 h. The mean elimination half-life was 8.5–9.8 h, the area under the curve and the maximum plasma concentration increased proportionally with dose. Following repeated evening administration of 25 mg, minimal accumulation was observed. There were no pharmacodynamic effects at 5 mg. At 15 mg, saccadic peak velocity (degree/s; SD) was reduced (69; 38), while other variables showed no effects. At 25 mg, effects on all objective pharmacodynamic parameters were observed. At 8–12 h post-dose, there were no differences to placebo and no next-day effects on pharmacodynamic variables after evening administration. Elderly subjects reported fewer adverse events compared to adults in previous studies. Conclusion: ACT-541468 in elderly subjects was well tolerated and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are compatible with a drug for the treatment of insomnia. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02571855