Genome function in higher eukaryotes involves major changes in the spatial organization of the chromatin fiber. Nevertheless, our understanding of chromatin folding is remarkably limited. Polymer models have been used to describe chromatin folding. However, none of the proposed models gives a satisfactory explanation of experimental data. In particularly, they ignore that each chromosome occupies a confined space, i.e., the chromosome territory. Here, we present a polymer model that is able to describe key properties of chromatin over length scales ranging from 0.5 to 75 Mb. This random loop (RL) model assumes a self-avoiding random walk folding of the polymer backbone and defines a probability P for 2 monomers to interact, creating loops of a broad size range. Model predictions are compared with systematic measurements of chromatin folding of the q-arms of chromosomes 1 and 11. The RL model can explain our observed data and suggests that on the tens-of-megabases length scale P is small, i.e., 10 -30 loops per 100 Mb. This is sufficient to enforce folding inside the confined space of a chromosome territory. On the 0.5-to 3-Mb length scale chromatin compaction differs in different subchromosomal domains. This aspect of chromatin structure is incorporated in the RL model by introducing heterogeneity along the fiber contour length due to different local looping probabilities. The RL model creates a quantitative and predictive framework for the identification of nuclear components that are responsible for chromatin-chromatin interactions and determine the 3-dimensional organization of the chromatin fiber.genome organization ͉ polymer model ͉ chromatin folding T he chromatin fiber inside the interphase nucleus of higher eukaryotes is folded and compacted on several length scales. On the smallest scale the basic filament is formed by wrapping double-stranded DNA around a histone protein octamer, forming a nucleosomal unit every Ϸ200 bp. This beads-on-a-string type filament in turn condenses to a fiber of 30-nm diameter, which detailed organization is still under debate (1-3). At bigger length scales the spatial organization of chromatin in the interphase nucleus is even more unclear. Imaging techniques do not allow one to directly follow the folding path of the chromatin fiber in the interphase nucleus. Therefore, indirect approaches have been used to obtain information about chromatin folding. One way, pursued in this study, is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to measure the relationship between the physical distance between genomic sequence elements (in m) and their genomic distance (in megabases). There have been several attempts to explain the folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus using polymer models. The strength of polymer models is their ability to make predictions on the structure of chromatin by pointing out the driving forces for observed folding motifs. These predictions can then be tested experimentally. However, a polymer model that is able to explain chromatin folding spanning differen...

A new study reveals a functional rule for N-terminal acetylation in higher eukaryotes called the (X)PX rule and describes a generic method that prevents this modification to allow the study of N-terminal acetylation in any given protein.

The three-dimensional (3D) organization of the chromosomal fiber in the human interphase nucleus is an important but poorly understood aspect of gene regulation. Here we quantitatively analyze and compare the 3D structures of two types of genomic domains as defined by the human transcriptome map. While ridges are gene dense and show high expression levels, antiridges, on the other hand, are gene poor and carry genes that are expressed at low levels. We show that ridges are in general less condensed, more irregularly shaped, and located more closely to the nuclear center than antiridges. Six human cell lines that display different gene expression patterns and karyotypes share these structural parameters of chromatin. This shows that the chromatin structures of these two types of genomic domains are largely independent of tissue-specific variations in gene expression and differentiation state. Moreover, we show that there is remarkably little intermingling of chromatin from different parts of the same chromosome in a chromosome territory, neither from adjacent nor from distant parts. This suggests that the chromosomal fiber has a compact structure that sterically suppresses intermingling. Together, our results reveal novel general aspects of 3D chromosome architecture that are related to genome structure and function.