No abstract

Background In the realm of shoulder surgery, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is one of the most painful procedures and is often associated with higher opioid consumption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative patient education and multimodal pain management to achieve an opioid-free postoperative recovery after RCR. Methods Sixty patients who underwent RCR were divided in 2 groups. All patientsreceived an interscalene nerve block and multimodal pain management. The opioid intervention group (OIG) in addition received preoperative education on expectations of pain, non opioid pain protocols, and alternate therapiesto minimize pain as well as customized postoperative instructions. Patients were compared on pain levels, opioid consumption, and outcomes scores preoperatively and at 48 hours, 2 weeks, and final follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes and opioid usage were compared and analyzed using student’s t-tests and logistic regression. Results At 48 hours, 15% of OIG patients reported use of rescue opioids after surgery compared with 100% of control group patients. Zero percent of OIG patients reported opioid use at 2 weeks compared to 90% of control group patients ( P = .0196). Patients in both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome scores ( P ≤ .05). At 6 weeks, functional, Constant, and satisfaction outcome scores were all higher in the OIG ( P < .05). At last follow-up, there were no significant differences for all patient-reported outcomes between groups. Conclusions Application of patient education tools and innovative multimodal pain management protocols successfully eliminates the need for opioids while maintaining excellent patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Background: As the popularity of youth soccer has increased in the United States, more attention has been focused on the effect of concussion injuries, with recent debate on whether heading should be disallowed. There is little evidence examining the epidemiology of these injuries. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and incidence of youth soccer-related concussions. We hypothesized that concussion rates will correlate with increased participation in youth soccer. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was used to collect data on concussion injuries that occurred during soccer in pediatric patients from 2008 through 2016. Soccer-related concussion injuries were identified using specific codes and were analyzed for variation in disposition. The types of contact were categorized into player-to-player, head-to-ball, player-to-post, and player-to-ground contacts. Contact types related to hospitalization were subanalyzed. Results: A weighted total of 3285 concussion injuries were identified during the study period, with an average of 386 concussions each year. The average age was 13.5 years, and there were no differences seen in incidence between the sexes. The overall incidence of concussion injuries increased ( r = 0.789), while hospitalizations decreased ( r = –0.574). The most common cause of concussion was found to be player-to-player contact, followed by head-to-ground contact and then head-to-ball contact. Subanalysis showed that 13% of hospitalizations were due to head-to-ball contact, compared with 39% and 44% due to player-to-player contact and head-to-ground contact, respectively. The relative risk of hospitalization from a concussion due to head-to-ball contact was 7.06 compared with 22.60 due to head-to-ground contact. Conclusion: The incidence of concussion in youth soccer has been increasing over the past decade as predicted, given the growing participation rates in both male and female soccer players. The most common cause of concussion was player-to-player contact, and the majority of concussions resulting in hospitalization occurred because of head-to-ground contact.

No abstract

Background There is an increasing need to understand what barriers are present to reduce opioid consumption in orthopedic practice. The purpose of this study was to better understand patient perceptions and understanding of opioid use after shoulder surgery. Methods Eighty-five patients who underwent shoulder surgery anonymously completed a 27-question survey adapted from the Maryland Public Opinion Survey on Opioids with additional demographics. The patients were asked about pain expectations after surgery, use of and access to opioids, opioid perceptions, and information provided regarding safe use, storage, and disposal of opioids. Results When asked about receiving information regarding opioids, only 36% of the patients reported having a conversation with their physician. When asked about appropriate use, 10% agree it is permissible to take more than the recommended dosage of prescription narcotics if they are feeling more pain than usual and 8.5% of the patients reported taking an opioid to get high multiple times in the past year. Furthermore, a majority agreed that opioids may lead to other substance abuse with 76% reporting the risk of harm to be great, and only 55% believing that opioid abuse may lead to overdose or death. Conclusions Surgeons need to be aware that most patients expect to have significant pain after shoulder surgery and expect to be given necessary and continued amounts of opioids. This highlights the need for better counseling and innovative nonopioid pain management protocols. At the institutional level, more effort needs to be made on providing adequate education and disposal mechanisms to help reduce diversion and misuse.