No abstract

Background: Women are more likely to search for information on behalf of both themselves and others, thus making them a valuable target for health information research. The purpose of this project was to identify and compare the most important medical concerns and sources of health information trusted by women in relationship to demographic differences in two different clinical settings within the same geographic area (Mayo Clinic Department of Family Medicine and Beaches Community Health care-a Sulzbacher Center Clinic). Methods: A novel survey tool was developed to obtain information regarding the age, race, and socioeconomic demographics of patients as well as the patients' personal significant medical concerns and trusted sources of health information. Results: Despite the huge development of health care information delivery through online resources, in our study, the majority of patients from both clinics still used and viewed their primary care provider as the most trusted source of health information. The health concerns most reported by both populations included cardiac health, breast and other cancers, and obesity; meanwhile, mental health was significantly more reported by patients from the free clinic. Conclusions: Education level may be an important factor of the awareness and ultimate treatment and prevention of these prevalent diseases. Furthermore, our study results may help improve patient satisfaction, knowledge, and health outcomes.

69 Background: Healthcare organizations can cultivate the strength of a diverse workforce in creating a culture of excellence. Enabling the team to understand how personal and cultural beliefs affect our decision making and how we interact with patients and colleagues is integral. Gaps in care exist in cancer diagnoses and treatment in many minority groups. A need for education in the nature of assumptions, unconscious biases, and awareness around the existence of healthcare disparities, was identified through culture transformation work within multiple healthcare institutions. Methods: An experiential course was designed for multi-disciplinary groups of providers. Designed to meet the evolving demographics in the country and help participants recognize how their own cultural beliefs and values affect their decision making. Topics include cultural awareness, assumptions and unconscious bias, effective use of interpreters, and skills to recognize when cultural differences may be playing a role and how to successfully navigate these situations. Raising awareness of healthcare disparities is highlighted, including disparities in cancer care diagnosis, treatment and outcomes for different ethnicities and socioeconomic groups. Examples include disparities in diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of lung cancer, colon cancer and breast cancer in minorities. Results: Participants engage in skills-based work. Participants develop a plan how they can take this information and education back to help create an awareness of disparities and skills to successfully navigate these situations. After this program, participants will be cognizant of the nature of assumptions and unconscious bias and understand the strength of diversity as an asset rather than a hindrance. Conclusions: Healthcare disparities can have a significant impact on patient experience, quality and outcomes. Specific inequities in cancer diagnosis and treatment in minorities is highlighted. Participants are provided with information and skills that can be introduced to their home institutions to have all caregivers recognize and successfully navigate culturally sensitive situations.