Objective: The aim was to compare the outcomes of subdural electrode (SDE) implantations versus stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG), the 2 predominant methods of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) performed in difficult-to-localize drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Methods: The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy created an international registry of iEEG patients implanted between 2005 and 2019 with ≥1 year of follow-up. We used propensity score matching to control exposure selection bias and generate comparable cohorts. Study endpoints were: (1) likelihood of resection after iEEG; (2) seizure freedom at last follow-up; and (3) complications (composite of postoperative infection, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or permanent neurological deficit).Results: Ten study sites from 7 countries and 3 continents contributed 2,012 patients, including 1,468 (73%) eligible for analysis (526 SDE and 942 SEEG), of whom 988 (67%) underwent subsequent resection. Propensity score matching improved covariate balance between exposure groups for all analyses. Propensity-matched patients who underwent SDE had higher odds of subsequent resective surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 1.84) and higher odds of complications (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.74; unadjusted: 9.6% after SDE vs 3.3% after SEEG). Odds of seizure freedom in propensity-matched resected patients were 1.66 times higher (95% CI 1.21, 2.26) for SEEG compared with SDE (unadjusted: 55% seizure free after SEEG-guided resections vs 41% after SDE). Interpretation: In comparison to SEEG, SDE evaluations are more likely to lead to brain surgery in patients with drugresistant epilepsy but have more surgical complications and lower probability of seizure freedom. This comparativeeffectiveness study provides the highest feasible evidence level to guide decisions on iEEG.

ObjectiveTo examine whether cannabis use is associated with or mediates psychosocial health in people with epilepsy.MethodsConsecutive adult epilepsy patients visiting the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Programme clinic were administered validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10-P), EuroQOL five dimensions five level scale (EQ-5D-5L), Global Assessment of Severity of Epilepsy Scale, Global Assessment of Disability Associated with Seizures Scale and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication scale. We used multiple regression analyses to investigate associations between cannabis use and PROMs. Mediation analyses were performed to determine the degree to which cannabis modulated the associations between current or past psychiatric disorders, monthly seizure frequency, and 1-year seizure freedom on psychosocial health.ResultsOf 337 consecutive patients, 71 (21%) reported cannabis use. Cannabis use was independently associated with depression (NDDI-E score≥14; OR 3.90; 95% CI 2.01 to 7.59; p<0.001), lower quality of life (β=−16.73, 95% CI − 26.26 to − 7.20; p=0.001), worse epilepsy-related disability (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.17; p=0.01) and lower satisfaction with antiepileptic medication (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.72; p=0.002). Cannabis use mediates 7%–12% of the effect of a psychiatric history on depression, worse quality of life and worse health valuation.ConclusionsThere is a strong and independent association between cannabis use and poor psychosocial health, and it partially mediates the deleterious effect of a psychiatric history on these same outcomes. Inclusion of PROMs in future cannabis trials is warranted.

Objective: No validated tools exist to assess satisfaction with epilepsy surgery. We aimed to develop and validate a new measure of patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery, the 19-item Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (ESSQ-19). Methods: An initial 31-item measure was developed based on literature review, patient focus groups, thematic analysis, and Delphi panels. The questionnaire was administered twice, 4-6 weeks apart, to 229 adults (≥18 years old) who underwent epilepsy surgery ≥1 year earlier, at three centers in Canada and one in Sweden. Participants also completed seven validated questionnaires to assess construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed the factorial structure of the questionnaire. Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) assessed the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the ESSQ-19. Spearman and polyserial correlations assessed construct validity. Results: Median age of participants and time since surgery were 42 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 32-54) and 5 years (IQR = 2-8.75), respectively. EFA and CFA yielded 18 items that segregated into four domains (mean score [SD]), namely, seizure control (76.4 [25]), psychosocial functioning (67.3 [26]), surgical complications (84 [22]), and recovery from surgery (73 [24]), one global satisfaction item, and a summary global score (74 [21]). The domain and summary scores demonstrated good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach ⍺ range = .84-.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC range = 0.71-0.85). Construct validity was supported by predicted correlations with other instruments. Significance: The ESSQ-19 is a new, valid, and reliable measure of patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery that can be used in clinical and research settings.

Aims. Patient satisfaction with therapeutic interventions is an important outcome of care. Although generic measures of patient satisfaction exist, there is no validated scale for measuring patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery. We aimed to systematically obtain patient-identified factors related to satisfaction with epilepsy surgery as a means of informing clinicians about the ways that patients evaluate outcomes of their treatment and as a conceptual basis for the future development of epilepsy surgery patient satisfaction scales. Methods. Focus group discussions with epilepsy surgery patients (n=9) were conducted to identify themes relevant to patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery and to draft initial items of importance. Consensus methodology (Delphi technique) was used to obtain expert opinion (n=13) to refine the items. Member-checking with focus group participants was performed to ensure the identified items were relevant, clear, and inclusive. Results. A list of 31 items embodied 12 themes related to patient-reported satisfaction with epilepsy surgery. These included adverse effects, medical care or rehabilitation, seizure control, post-operative recovery, anti-seizure medication, independence, seizure worry, ability to drive, social relationships, self-confidence, improved cognitive function, and improved physical health. Conclusions. This study used a systematic approach to identify factors that are important to patients when assessing satisfaction with epilepsy surgery. This knowledge can assist clinicians caring for these patients and is also a critical step towards the validation of a formal scale to assess satisfaction with epilepsy surgery.

No abstract