The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the present most common web application vulnerabilities, according to OWASP, and show through several scenarios how they can be exploited by malicious users. We present a brief description of each vulnerability and give its root causes, in order to help the reader understand why it happens. Considering that security and functional tests are fundamentally different, we describe what to look for when searching for web application weaknesses. Since the best approach in security is to be proactive, we provide a list of controls that should be in place to avoid those problems in the first place. ResumoO objetivo deste capítulo é apresentar as vulnerabilidades mais comuns que afetam aplicações web, de acordo com o OWASP, e mostrar, por meio de diversos cenários, como elas podem ser exploradas por usuários maliciosos. Uma breve descrição de cada vulnerabilidade é apresentada, juntamente com as causas principais, para que o leitor compreenda porque elas ocorrem. Considerando que testes funcionais e de segurança são fundamentalmente diferentes, descreve-se o que procurar durante o processo de detecção de fraquezas nessas aplicações. Finalmente, como a melhor abordagem para segurança é ser pró-ativo, uma lista de controles para evitar a presença dessas vulnerabilidades é fornecida.

e12595 Background: Preoperative breast MRI can provide important clinical information on the surgical management of BC patients (pts). However, there is no evidence that it can produce a statistical impact on surgical outcomes in the early BC setting. This retrospective study sought to evaluate whether preoperative MRI was significantly correlated with CSur among early BC pts. Methods: Digital and physical records from 532 pts treated in a specialized BC center in Brazil from 2005 to 2018 were analyzed. The institutional database registered pathological, radiological and clinical information. The categorical variables CSur and MRI were analyzed by Chi-squared coefficient of correlation, whereas significant correlations were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. All statistical analysis were performed in STATA version 15.1C. Results: The present analysis included 532 pts. The diagnosis was suspected through suspicious self-exam in 380 pts (71%), while 129 pts (24%) had altered mammary screening tests. Clinical T and N stages were: T0-1=154pts (29%); T2=179 pts (33%); T3=135 pts (25%); T4=49 pts (9%); N0=267 pts (50%); N1=172 pts (32%); N2=80 pts (15%). Neoadjuvant treatment was performed in 223 pts (42%). MRI was indicated in 248 pts (46%). CSur was performed in 149 pts (28%). Margins were positive in 15 cases. This study found a statistically significant correlation between CSur and MRI ( X2 = 8.07; p=0.018). Although, when controlled for neoadjuvant treatment, T, N, and age, the independent variable MRI was not a statistical predictor of CSur (R=0.008; t=0.25; p=0.8; 95%CI -0.57 – 0.74). Advanced T and neoadjuvant treatment were inversely correlated with CSur in the multivariate analysis (R= -0.11; t= -7.8; p<0.001 and R= -0.11; t= -2.88; p=0.004, respectively). One multivariate analysis to evaluate predictors of T stages showed that suspicious self-exam and N stage had a significant linear relationship with T stages when controlled for age (R=0.70; t=7.9; p<0.001; and R=0.76; t=15; p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Preoperative MRI can have impact on the conservative surgical management of curable BC patients and the present analysis showed a positive correlation. In the logistic regression model, MRI was not identified as a predictor of CSur, however the proportion of locally advanced BC may have influenced the results. Further studies must be strengthened for identifying in which subgroup of patients MRI may be a predictor of surgical outcomes.

Introduction: Most breast and ovarian cancers in women are sporadic. However, five to ten percent of these individuals may have an inherited predisposition to cancer (Famorca-Tram, 2015). Women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 are at risk of breast cancer of up to 72% and of ovarian cancer of up to 44%. Pathogenic variants of the BRCA2 gene increase the risk of breast cancer by up to 69% and of ovarian cancer by up to 25%. Risk reduction measures include: risk-reducing mastectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and chemoprevention. For women who do not choose any of these measures, follow-up with periodic examinations is necessary. In this work, the risk reduction measures adopted by 52 women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 in a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, are analyzed. In addition, it was analyzed what factors could influence the risk-reducing measure adopted. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study with a sample of 52 women with pathogenic variants identified in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes seen at a tertiary hospital. Results: 80.8% opted for surgical management as a risk-reducing measure, with 46.2% of women having had prophylactic mastectomy, 11.5% having had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 23.1% having undergone both surgical procedures. Non-surgical management occurred in 19.2% of the cases, with 8% (3 cases) undergoing chemoprophylaxis with tamoxifen and 15.4% undergoing surveillance. Conclusion: Most patients opted for surgical intervention, with risk-reducing mastectomy being the most frequent one, followed by salpingo-oophorectomy. When testing was not requested by the geneticist, there was a greater tendency toward the surgical option.