Aims The original Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I diagnostic algorithms have been demonstrated to be reliable. However, the Validation Project determined that the RDC/TMD Axis I validity was below the target sensitivity of ≥ 0.70 and specificity of ≥ 0.95. Consequently, these empirical results supported the development of revised RDC/TMD Axis I diagnostic algorithms that were subsequently demonstrated to be valid for the most common pain-related TMD and for one temporomandibular joint (TMJ) intra-articular disorder. The original RDC/TMD Axis II instruments were shown to be both reliable and valid. Working from these findings and revisions, two international consensus workshops were convened, from which recommendations were obtained for the finalization of new Axis I diagnostic algorithms and new Axis II instruments. Methods Through a series of workshops and symposia, a panel of clinical and basic science pain experts modified the revised RDC/TMD Axis I algorithms by using comprehensive searches of published TMD diagnostic literature followed by review and consensus via a formal structured process. The panel's recommendations for further revision of the Axis I diagnostic algorithms were assessed for validity by using the Validation Project's data set, and for reliability by using newly collected data from the ongoing TMJ Impact Project—the follow-up study to the Validation Project. New Axis II instruments were identified through a comprehensive search of the literature providing valid instruments that, relative to the RDC/TMD, are shorter in length, are available in the public domain, and currently are being used in medical settings. Results The newly recommended Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) Axis I protocol includes both a valid screener for detecting any pain-related TMD as well as valid diagnostic criteria for differentiating the most common pain-related TMD (sensitivity ≥ 0.86, specificity ≥ 0.98) and for one intra-articular disorder (sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.97). Diagnostic criteria for other common intra-articular disorders lack adequate validity for clinical diagnoses but can be used for screening purposes. Inter-examiner reliability for the clinical assessment associated with the validated DC/TMD criteria for pain-related TMD is excellent (kappa ≥ 0.85). Finally, a comprehensive classification system that includes both the common and less common TMD is also presented. The Axis II protocol retains selected original RDC/TMD screening instruments augmented with new instruments to assess jaw function as well as behavioral and additional psychosocial factors. The Axis II protocol is divided into screening and comprehensive self-report instrument sets. The screening instruments’ 41 questions assess pain intensity, pain-related disability, psychological distress, jaw functional limitations, and parafunctional behaviors, and a pain drawing is used to assess locations of pain. The comprehensive instruments, composed of 81 questions, assess i...

Facial pain of patients with craniomandibular disorders might be caused by muscle overload. However, the activity of masticatory muscles of healthy individuals is still unknown. The aim of this study was therefore a first attempt to clarify this question by recording the masseter muscle activity of healthy subjects during sleep by means of portable recorders. The study was performed on 21 healthy subjects selected after telephone and questionnaire screenings and clinical examination from among randomly selected inhabitants of Zürich. The masseter EMG was recorded during seven nights in each subject's natural environment with the electrodes in reproducible position. The signal was analyzed for number, amplitude, and duration of contraction periods defined as signal portions above a threshold which could contain sub-threshold signal portions shorter than the standby time of 5 sec. The signal amplitude was expressed in percent of the amplitude recorded during maximum voluntary clenches (%MVC). An average of 71.9 +/- 28.7 contraction episodes per night (men, 74.7 +/- 30.1; women, 65.0 +/- 23.8; p = 0.043), i.e., of 10.5 +/- 3.8 per hour (men, 11.0 +/- 4.0; women, 9.3 +/- 3.0; p = 0.005), was found. The average mean amplitude was 26.2 +/- 6.4% MVC (men, 27.0 +/- 6.8; women, 24.4 +/- 4.5; p = 0.009). The duration of the episodes had a mode of 0.5 sec, and the group mean of the integral of the amplitude over time was 123.7 +/- 157.9% MVC (men, 138.9 +/- 184.0; women, 85.9 +/- 28.2; p = 0.005). Healthy subjects showed intermittent periods of masseter activity during sleep which, on average, were of rather low intensity and short duration.

Despite wide use of systems to record jaw motion with six degrees of freedom, most studies have analyzed only the movement of a single mandibular point. The finite helical axis (FHA) is a mathematical model which can be used to describe comprehensively the movements of a rigid body. The aim of this investigation was to describe the FHA of the mandible during habitual jaw movements. Thirty subjects (13 females, 17 males; mean age, 26 years; range, 18 to 34 years) without myoarthropathies of the masticatory system participated in the study. Opening and closing movements, performed at 1-Hz frequency, were recorded with the optoelectronic system Jaws-3D. Three opening and closing movements were recorded from the right side and three from the left side of the jaw. The movement data were low-pass-filtered for noise reduction prior to the computation of the finite helical axis by means of a software program developed in our laboratory. The following parameters were calculated: the rotation of the FHA, its spatial orientation, and the translation along it, as well as its position and distance relative to an intracondylar point. In addition, methodological errors of the model were calculated. During opening and closing, the group mean FHA rotation was 24.3 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees. The group mean of the maximum total translation along the FHA was 0.9 +/- 0.7 mm. The group mean distance between the FHA and the intracondylar point was 48.9 +/- 9.9 mm. The FHA pathways were smooth and varied between individuals. Furthermore, the finite helical axes were never localized within the condyle, and often were located outside of the mandible. The analysis of the FHA pathways yields more information on whole mandibular movements than simply the movements of a single condylar point.

Movement over the surface of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc produces tractional forces. These forces potentially increase the magnitude of shear stresses and contribute to wear and fatigue of the disc. Theoretically, tractional forces in all synovial joints are the result of frictional forces, due to rubbing of the cartilage surfaces, and plowing forces, due to translation of the stress-field through the cartilage matrix as the joint surface congruency changes during motion. For plowing forces to occur in the TMJ, there must be mediolateral translation of the stress-field as the condyle moves dorsoventrally during jaw function. To test whether mediolateral stress-field translation occurs in the intact TMJ, we measured stress-field position and translation velocities in ten normal individuals during rhythmic jaw opening and closing. Magnetic resonance imaging and jaw tracking were combined to animate the three-dimensional position of the stress-field between the articulating surfaces. This allowed for mediolateral translation velocity measurements of the centroid of the stress-field. The results showed that during jaw opening and closing at 0.5 Hz, the average peak mediolateral translation velocity was 35 ± 17 mm/sec. When opening and closing increased to 1.0 Hz, the average peak velocity was 40 ± 19 mm/sec. Theoretical model estimates of the work done during such translation ranged from 6 to 709 mJ between the individual joints studied. The potential clinical importance of this measure is that long-term exposure of the TMJ disc to high work may result in fatigue failure of the TMJ disc.

SUMMARY