Objectives To compare self-reported levels of ‘anticipated’ stigma and experience of care in general practice between current and ex-smokers living with COPD, other chronic illnesses, or those with no chronic conditions. Methods Participants completed an online survey, advertised through social media, about their experience of care from general practitioners (GPs) in the past 12 months. Respondents self-reported doctor-diagnosed chronic illnesses. Experience of care and anticipated stigma was assessed using validated questions. Multi-nominal regressions were used to determine independent effect of smoking status on anticipated stigma and other indicators of patient experience in primary care. Results Patients with COPD (n = 161) reported significantly higher anticipated stigma scores compared to those with other chronic conditions (n = 225) and this was strongly related to delayed or avoidance in seeking help from a GP when needed. This relationship remained irrespective of current smoking status. There was no difference between groups for relational components of experience of care. Discussion Primary care patients living with COPD reported worse experience of care across several domains and were more likely to anticipate experiencing stigma in the GP setting irrespective of their current smoking status compared to those with other chronic illnesses or no chronic illnesses.

BackgroundPeople living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are a group who may be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. This vulnerability has been associated with increased anxiety or fear about exposure to the virus, which may also impact upon experience in healthcare settings.Aim/objectivesThe aim of this narrative mixed-methods review was to systematically scope, identify and synthesise findings from peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in academic journals describing the healthcare experiences of adults living with COPD independently in the community, following the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019–June 2022.MethodsDatabases including Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Ovid Emcare and CINAHL Plus were searched. Studies were uploaded to Covidence to support selection and appraisal of studies. Studies were appraised for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis of these themes was provided, and qualitative and quantitative findings are interpreted together in the discussion.FindingsThe quality and experience of care for patients with COPD was impacted through the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovations and adoption of technologies such as telehealth and telerehabilitation were well received and mitigated the potential implications of severe disruption to care access to some extent. Patients feared feeling forgotten and experienced isolation and anxiety; however, telerehabilitation and exercise through modalities such as Zoom classes help support social connection and physical activity.ImplicationsThese innovations are likely to be useful to be offered to patients on an ongoing basis, and education and standardised protocols around their use will benefit healthcare providers and patients alike.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022341168.

BackgroundStudies investigating lived experiences of patients with COPD raise important concerns about interactions with healthcare professionals. Patients often describe feelings of guilt and shame associated with their COPD and may experience stigma and poor patient experience of care.Aim/ObjectivesTo systematically scope and synthesise findings from peer-reviewed qualitative studies describing healthcare experiences of patients living with COPD across community care settings.MethodsA meta-ethnography was undertaken. Database searches were performed in Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL Plus and Sociological Abstracts. Eligible qualitative studies were included. Study screening and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. A ‘line-of-argument’ synthesis and deductive and inductive analysis was used to identify key themes, where the deductive element aligned to Wong and Haggerty's six key dimensions of patient experiences [1].ResultsData from 23 studies were included. Experiences and their meaning to patients were explored within the context of six domains of patient experience including access, interpersonal communication, continuity and coordination, comprehensiveness and trust. Inductive coding revealed emotion, stigma, identity and vulnerability shaped healthcare experiences of adults with COPD.ImplicationsExperiences often fell short of what was expected and needed in community settings. Adopting strategies to improve experiences of care in the community can be expected to improve self-management and contribute to improved health outcomes and quality of life. These strategies should take account of vulnerability, stigma and emotions such as guilt and blame that are potent affective drivers of the experience of care for patients with COPD.

Background Studies of the lived experience of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reveal a number of challenges patients face when interacting with healthcare providers that may be exacerbated by unwillingness or inability to quit smoking. However, none have explored, in-depth, primary care experiences among patients with COPD in community healthcare settings. Aims/ objective The study investigated healthcare experiences of patients living independently in the community with COPD who smoked or had recently quit (at most within the last 5 years), seeking care in primary care settings. Method An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) involving thirteen participants purposively recruited from social media posts in COPD and carer support groups, general community groups, community noticeboards and paid adverts on social media. In-depth interviews were held between February and April 2022 by phone or Zoom™ and explored patient experience of primary care, focusing on how smoking patterns, addiction and stigma impact upon and shape these experiences. Results Participants were aged between 45 to 75 years. Nine were female and two thirds were current smokers. Problematic experiences including time-constrained consultations, having to self-advocate for care “…go digging myself and then go and see him and say, can we do this, can we do that type of thing?” and guilt about smoking were common. Positive care experiences described non-judgemental interpersonal interactions with doctors, timely referral, proactive care and trust “I have an actual great trust for my GP… they’re awesome, they’ll look after you”. Participants described how their care experience shifted as primary care adapted care delivery during COVID-19. Conclusions Pro-active, empathetic care from general practitioners is desired from patients living with COPD. Stigma and fear of judgement was an important underlying driver of negative care experiences contributing to delayed help seeking from general practitioners.

ContextStudies of the lived experience of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) reveal a number of challenges patients face when interacting with healthcare providers that may be exacerbated by unwillingness or inability to quit smoking. However, none have explored, in-depth, primary care experiences among patients with COPD in community healthcare settings.