Objective Conservatrice et Hémodynamique de l'Insuffisance Veineuse en Ambulatoire, the French acronym for CHIVA, is a strategy aimed to convert a venous reflux into a physiological drainage. We compared CHIVA with radiofrequency ablation and determined its possible advantages. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical recurrence, ultrasound recurrence, quality of life scores, and complications. They were compared after propensity score matching. Results 212 limbs of 166 patients were included: 42 limbs underwent radiofrequency ablation and 170 limbs underwent CHIVA. The hospital stay was shorter in the CHIVA group. There was no difference in clinical, ultrasound recurrence, quality of life scores and complications between the two groups. The preoperative saphenous vein diameter was larger in the recurrence cases. Conclusions CHIVA showed comparable results to radiofrequency ablation. There was more ultrasound recurrence with larger vein diameters. The CHIVA appears to be a simple and more efficient treatment method when performed on select patients.

Venous hypertension, caused by venous reflux, often leads to heaviness, swelling, and pain in the legs. However, the hemodynamics of venous flow are complex and incomprehensible, with a frequently unclear correlation between reflux and symptoms. Regarding treatment options, removal of saphenous veins (SVs) based on a few seconds of reflux can adversely affect patients. Further, indiscriminate removal of SVs in aging populations may complicate future treatment of arterial diseases. Patients should be treated selectively based on ultrasound examinations and hemodynamic principles. The CHIVA strategy, which involves treating patients without removing SVs, is a potential treatment option for patients with mild chronic venous insufficiency. In this context, we introduce the Teupitz shunt classification, which forms the basis for hemodynamic correction.

Objective: Edema of the lower extremities can occur in various situations. We aim to identify the causes of edema commonly encountered in clinical practice and determine the role of vascular specialists in lower extremity edema. Methods: From January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019, 112 medical records were reviewed retrospectively. We referred to the algorithm for leg edema. We proposed a final diagnosis based on the medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and consultation with other specialists. Results: Among the 112 patients, 42 (37.5%) patients were diagnosed with chronic vascular disease. Overall, 28 (25%) patients had no clearly identified causes and were considered idiopathic. Another 28 (25%) patients had musculoskeletal disorders and 10 (2.9%) patients had medical disease. There were 4 isolated cases of dermatitis, insect bites, pregnancy, and morbid obesity. 24 cases (21.4%) of the 112 patients were diagnosed with lower-extremity varicose veins, with 17 (15.2%) patients showing reflux in the saphenous vein on Doppler ultrasound. Conclusion:In this study, various leg edema indicated the need for interdisciplinary consultations and differential diagnoses. Chronic venous disease treatment does not seem to have an absolute significance in lower extremity edema. But, vascular specialists play the role of a control tower in diagnosing lower extremity edema.

Background: Improving the understanding varicose veins (VV) is increasing due to life extension and concerns regarding quality of life. Recently, endovascular treatment has become more common, even in mild cases. Excessive procedures are often performed before conservative and non-surgical treatments. We aimed to explain the efficacy of medication, compression, sclerotherapy, and stripping of treatments and to consider the appropriate indications for many treatment methods, including endovascular procedures.Current Concepts: Venoactive drugs can be used as first-line agents for symptoms, such as edema, at all stages of varicose vein. These are effective adjuvant agents and can help achieve compression before and after procedures. Compression therapy is effective for skin change and ulcers and is excellent for the improvement of symptoms. Sclerotherapy has been widely used as an adjuvant treatment, but recently, its indications have been expanded for non-invasive causes. Traditional high ligation and stripping is still the recommended treatment option for recurrent or complicated varicose veins.Discussion and Conclusion: The patients’ symptoms should be evaluated more critically than assessing only the venous reflux using ultrasound. Additionally, objective evaluation of various causes of lower extremity discomfort should be considered. Treatment according to appropriate indications, such as medication, compression, sclerotherapy, stripping, and endovascular therapy, can improve the patients’ quality of life and prevent complications.