Background. Liver metastasis develops in approximately two‐thirds of patients with recurrent uveal melanoma. Despite therapy, the median survival of those with liver metastasis is 5 to 7 months. The recognition of a grave prognosis associated with liver metastasis has led to evaluation of new modalities of therapy, including the use of regional therapies such as intrahepatic arterial chemotherapy and either embolization or chemoembolization of hepatic metastases. In this study, the results of an institutional experience over the past 2 decades are reviewed and prognostic factors that affect survival from the time the liver metastasis is diagnosed are assessed. Methods. In this study of 201 patients with uveal melanoma involving the liver who were treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1968 and 1991, the authors retrospectively reviewed the cases and compared the results of systemic therapies, hepatic infra‐arterial chemotherapies, and chemoembolization of liver metastases. Cox's multivariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression were then computed to determine significant prognostic variables. Results. The systemic therapies produced a response rate of less than 1%. Chemoembolization was the most effective treatment, inducing responses in 36% of patients. Survival curves were calculated using the life‐table method of Kaplan and Meier. Patient‐and tumor‐related characteristics were examined and their relation to on survival from the time of diagnosis of liver metastasis was determined. Levels of serum alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and lactic dehydrogenase plus response to treatment showed a strong relation to survival. In contrast, univariate analysis showed that patient age and gender, metastasis free interval, presence of extrahepatic metastasis, and type of therapy for liver metastasis did not influence survival. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis identified serum alkaline phosphatase and metastasis free interval as the main independent prognostic factors for survival after liver metastasis diagnosis. Conclusions. Of the three modalities of therapy used for choroidal melanoma metastatic to the liver, only chemoembolization using cisplatin‐based regimens produced a meaningful response rate. Information from this analysis can be used to predict the outcome of patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver. Patients with metastatic ocular melanoma confined to the liver should be treated with chemoembolization and should not be included in chemotherapy trials designed for cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 1995; 76:1665–70.
Analysis of peripheral blood or tumor DNA samples from 101 patients with apparent sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) was performed to assess the frequency of RET proto-oncogene mutations in this patient population. Peripheral blood and/or tumor DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction. DNA sequence or restriction enzyme analysis was performed to detect mutations of RET proto-oncogene codons 609, 611, 618, 620, 634, 768, and 918. Six of 101 patients with apparent sporadic MTC had peripheral blood DNA mutations more commonly associated with hereditary MTC. In 4 patients, these mutations led to the identification of previously unrecognized kindreds. The remaining 2 patients were examples of de novo mutations. A codon 918 mutation was found in 14 of 57 (approximately 25%) tumor DNA samples. Mutations were not identified in the remaining patients. In this large cancer center population, approximately 6% of patients with sporadic MTC carry peripheral blood DNA mutations, either inherited or de novo, more commonly associated with MEN 2A or familial MTC. Seven additional gene carriers were identified as a direct result of these studies, a 2-fold multiplying effect. We conclude routine application of RET proto-oncogene testing should be included in all cases of apparent sporadic MTC.
One hundred and ninety-seven members of 28 kindreds with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A) were screened for RET proto-oncogene exon 10 and 11 mutations. Seventy-one known affected individuals had mutations of codons 609, 618, 620 or 634, whereas 53 unaffected individuals had no abnormalities. Nineteen out of 54 individuals of unknown status, mostly children, had RET mutations. Four of these children had thyroidectomy based on this analysis and were found to have C-cell abnormalities. We identified one false negative mutation analysis because of a codon 691 polymorphism. We conclude that RET mutational analysis is a cost-effective and accurate method for determination of gene carrier status in MEN 2A.
Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) mediates signaling across the cell membrane by interaction with the RET-GDNFR alpha receptor complex. We identified a family in which one member had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and four members had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Knowledge that mutations in the RET proto-oncogene cause MTC and studies documenting genitourinary abnormalities in RET or GDNF knockout mice led us to examine the GDNF/RET-GDNFR alpha signaling complex in this family. RET and GDNF were excluded as the causative VUR gene by haplotype and sequence analysis. The GDNFR alpha gene was mapped to chromosome 10q25-26 by radiation hybrid techniques and was eliminated as the causative gene by haplotype analysis and sequencing of cDNA from an obligate carrier. Sequencing identified a 15-nucleotide deletion in GDNFR alpha mRNA, which was found to code for a single exon; analysis of several cell types revealed an identical mRNA form, indicating that this variant is a product of alternative RNA processing. We conclude that GDNFR alpha maps to 10q25-26 and that its RNA transcript is alternatively processed. Mutation abnormalities in the GDNF/RET-GDNFR alpha signaling system do not cause VUR in this family.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.