Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare life-threatening anesthetic complication with high mortality rates. MH during adult kidney transplant has been reported previously. However, the occurrence of MH after multiple previous uneventful anesthetic exposures in a pediatric kidney transplant recipient is rare. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of MH in a child undergoing a live donor kidney transplant.The approaches for addressing perioperative challenges and ethical dilemmas to ensure successful outcomes are described. The recipient, a 5-year-old male child, weighing 20 kg, with a history of multiple previous uneventful anesthetic exposures, underwent live donor kidney transplant for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Postreperfusion he developed fulminant MH with rapidly progressing hyperthermia, hypercarbia, tachycardia, and muscle rigidity, which in addition to complicating the medical management raised several ethical issues as well. MH was successfully managed with dantrolene and other supportive measures. Judicious use of inotropes and fluids helped maintain stable hemodynamics and graft perfusion. Management of MH is complicated in a pediatric patient with ESRD undergoing live donor kidney transplant. Preference for non-depolarizing muscle relaxants instead of succinylcholine during endotracheal intubation can result in delayed onset of clinical manifestations. However, the metabolic complications may be more severe due to preexisting electrolyte and acid-base disturbances. Maintaining optimal graft perfusion while simultaneously combating MH can be very challenging in a child. Since the allograft is a precious commodity, critical decisions regarding the harvesting of the donor kidney need to be well thought out. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment with dantrolene are critical to preserving graft function and the recipient's life.

Background and objectiveThe advent of robot-assisted kidney transplant (RAKT) has ushered in a new set of challenges. In this singlecenter retrospective observational study, we aimed to highlight the anesthetic challenges and analyze perioperative parameters to identify the risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) in RAKT. MethodsA descriptive analysis of perioperative factors of the first 100 cases of RAKT at our center was performed. Data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical records (EMR) of donors and adult patients who underwent RAKT between July 2015 and December 2020. The data analyzed included demographics, preoperative optimization, intraoperative and postoperative management, and complications. DGF was defined as a requirement of dialysis within one week of transplant. The Fisher's exact test, independent sample t-test, and the Mann-Whitney test were used to analyze data. ResultsAmong a total of 193 renal transplants performed during the study period, 100 patients underwent RAKT, which included 27 females and 73 males. Of these, 91 were live while the remaining involved deceaseddonor transplants. Pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position required various "anesthetic maneuvers" to maintain hemodynamics and respiratory parameters. Optimal fluid management, with frusemide and mannitol, ensured good urine output (UOP) (93%). Post-reperfusion, the release of pneumoperitoneum, maintenance of adequate perfusion pressures, immunosuppression, and regional hypothermia helped in ensuring adequate graft function (93%). The incidence of DGF in our series was 7% and the mortality rate was 3%. Recipient age (p=0.045), dyslipidemia (p=0.021), and diabetes mellitus (p=0.023) were identified as significant risk factors for DGF. ConclusionAdvanced recipient age, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were factors significantly associated with DGF in RAKT in our series of 100 cases. However, the duration of the steep Trendelenburg position, docking of robot/pneumoperitoneum (console time), fluid management, warm and cold ischemia times, rewarming time, and type of graft did not influence DGF. Awareness of the systemic involvement in RAKT, proper preoperative optimization, and knowledge of potential problems are essential for the efficient anesthetic management of RAKT.

No abstract