OBJECTIVE -Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive, clinical examination technique that quantifies small nerve fiber pathology. We have used it to assess the neurological benefits of pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-In 20 patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and 15 control subjects, corneal sensitivity was evaluated using noncontact corneal esthesiometry, and small nerve fiber morphology was assessed using CCM.RESULTS -Corneal sensitivity (1.54 Ϯ 0.28 vs. 0.77 Ϯ 0.02, P Ͻ 0.0001), nerve fiber density (NFD) (13.8 Ϯ 2.1 vs. 42 Ϯ 3.2, P Ͻ 0.0001), nerve branch density (NBD) (4.04 Ϯ 1.5 vs. 26.7 Ϯ 2.5, P Ͻ 0.0001), and nerve fiber length (NFL) (2.23 Ϯ 0.2 vs. 9.69 Ϯ 0.7, P Ͻ 0.0001) were significantly reduced, and nerve fiber tortuosity (NFT) (15.7 Ϯ 1.02 vs. 19.56 Ϯ 1.34, P ϭ 0.04) was increased in diabetic patients before pancreas transplantation. Six months after SPK, 15 patients underwent a second assessment and showed a significant improvement in NFD (18.04 Ϯ 10.48 vs. 9.25 Ϯ 1.87, P ϭ 0.001) and NFL (3.60 Ϯ 0.33 vs. 1.84 Ϯ 0.33, P ϭ 0.002) with no change in NBD (1.38 Ϯ 0.74 vs. 1.38 Ϯ 1.00, P ϭ 1.0), NFT (15.58 Ϯ 1.20 vs. 16.30 Ϯ 1.19, P ϭ 0.67), or corneal sensitivity (1.23 Ϯ 0.39 vs. 1.54 Ϯ 00.42, P ϭ 0.59).CONCLUSIONS -Despite marked nerve fiber damage in type 1 diabetic patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, small fiber repair can be detected within 6 months of pancreas transplantation using CCM. CCM is a novel noninvasive clinical technique to assess the benefits of therapeutic intervention in human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 30:2608-2612, 2007S omatic polyneuropathy is one of the most common long-term complications of diabetes and is the main initiating factor for foot ulceration and lower extremity amputation (1,2). As 80% of amputations are preceded by foot ulceration, an effective means of detecting and treating peripheral neuropathy would have a major medical, social, and economic impact. With the exception of optimal glycemic control, there are currently no licensed treatments that prevent, slow, or arrest the development of neuropathy (1). The development of new treatments is of paramount importance, but they are hampered by a lack of clinically relevant surrogate end points favored by regulatory authorities (1). We have relied on tests that quantify predominantly large nerve fiber dysfunction, which were principally developed to aid diagnosis and not to assess nerve repair and hence a therapeutic response (3). Thus, nerve conduction studies are useful but only detect an abnormality in large myelinated nerve fibers, whereas thermal and pain thresholds assess thinly myelinated (A␦) and unmyelinated (C) fiber function. Heart rate variability during respiratory stimuli indicates parasympathetic vagal efferent function, and blood pressure change during orthostatic manipulation evaluates sympathetic vasomotor efferents.Although these tests correlate with axonal los...
This study demonstrates that it is feasible to safely transplant potential PT recipients aged 50 and above. However, good medical assessment and careful patient selection is strongly recommended.
Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? The indications and timing of native nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is controversial, especially for those undergoing renal transplantation. Post‐transplant unilateral native nephrectomy appears to be the preferred intervention compared to pre‐transplant native nephrectomy. There seems to be substantial additive risk to bilateral over unilateral nephrectomy, especially prior to transplantation. Pre‐transplant native nephrectomy should only be carried out when there are clear indications such as massive size preventing allograft placement, severe pain, early satiety, recurrent bleeding and infections, or suspected malignancy. OBJECTIVE To analyse indications, timing and outcomes of native nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients listed for kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of all ADPKD patients who had a native nephrectomy prior to or following transplantation between January 2003 and December 2009 at a single centre, including those undergoing the sandwich technique (removal of the most severely affected native kidney prior to transplantation, and the other afterwards), was undertaken. RESULTS There were 35 individuals in our cohort (M : F = 16 : 19), with a median age of 51.5 years (range 43–65). Twenty patients were in the pre‐transplant nephrectomy group, 12 in the post‐transplant group, and three underwent the sandwich technique. Indications for nephrectomy varied but were most commonly pain/discomfort, space for transplantation, ongoing haematuria, recurrent infections, and gastrointestinal pressure symptoms (early satiety). Seven individuals in the pre‐transplant group and three in the post‐transplant group required critical care admission after nephrectomy. Transient renal graft dysfunction occurred in two post‐transplant bilateral nephrectomy patients. Two patients in the bilateral nephrectomy pre‐transplant group and one in the bilateral nephrectomy post‐transplant group died in the immediate post‐operative period. No complications were noted in the sandwich technique group. CONCLUSION Native nephrectomy in ADPKD is a major undertaking associated with significant morbidity especially in the pre‐transplant group. Post‐transplant unilateral nephrectomy appears to be the safest approach with fewest complications.
Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia) is a widely used traditional remedy for hyperglycemia. While the medicinal properties of this plant have been studied extensively using in vitro and animal models, the clinical efficacy and safety in humans is largely unknown. This review discusses the benefits and limitations of bitter melon supplementation in the context of epidemic levels of insulin resistance and pre-diabetes throughout the world.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.