Objective: The RNS System is a direct brain-responsive neurostimulation system that is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures based on safety and effectiveness data from controlled clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the realworld safety and effectiveness of the RNS System. Methods: Eight comprehensive epilepsy centers conducted a chart review of patients treated with the RNS System for at least 1 year, in accordance with the indication for use. Data included device-related serious adverse events and the median percent change in disabling seizure frequency from baseline at years 1, 2, and 3 of treatment and at the most recent follow-up. Results: One hundred fifty patients met the criteria for analysis. The median reduction in seizures was 67% (interquartile range [IQR] = 33%-93%, n = 149) at 1 year, 75% (IQR = 50%-94%, n = 93) at 2 years, 82% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 38) at ≥3 years, and 74% (IQR = 50%-96%, n = 150) at last follow-up (mean = 2.3 years). Thirty-five percent of patients had a ≥90% seizure frequency reduction, and 18% of patients reported being clinically seizure-free at last follow-up. Seizure frequency reductions were similar regardless of patient age, age at epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, seizure onset in mesial temporal or neocortical foci, magnetic resonance imaging findings, prior intracranial monitoring, prior epilepsy surgery, or prior vagus nerve stimulation treatment. The infection rate per procedure was 2.9% (6/150 patients); five of the six patients had an implant site infection, and one had osteomyelitis. Lead revisions were required in 2.7% (4/150), and 2.0% (3/150) of patients had a subdural hemorrhage, none of which had long-lasting neurological consequences. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmerc ial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Drug‐resistant focal epilepsy with regional neocortical seizure onsets originating from the posterior quadrant can be particularly difficult to treat with resective surgery due to the overlap with eloquent cortex. Published reports indicate that corticothalamic treatment targeting the anterior or centromedian nucleus of the thalamus with direct brain‐responsive stimulation may be an effective approach to treat regional neocortical epilepsy. The pulvinar has remained largely unstudied as a neurostimulation target to treat refractory epilepsy. Because the pulvinar has connections with the posterior quadrant, neurostimulation may be effective if applied to seizures originating in this area. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with regional neocortical seizure onsets in the posterior quadrant treated with the RNS System. Demographics, epilepsy history, clinical seizure frequencies, and neuropsychological testing results were obtained from the chart. Electrocorticogram (ECoG) records stored by the RNS System were reviewed to evaluate electrographic seizure onset patterns. Our patients were followed for 10, 12.5, and 15 months. All patients were responders (≥50% seizure reduction), and two of the three patients experienced a ≥90% reduction in seizures at the last follow‐up. Pre‐ and postsurgical neuropsychological evaluations were compared for two of the patients, and there was no evidence of cognitive decline found in either patient. Interestingly, mild cognitive improvements were reported. The third patient had only postimplant neuropsychological testing data available. Findings for this patient suggested executive dysfunction that was present prior to the RNS System which did not worsen with surgery. A visual inspection of ECoGs revealed near‐simultaneous seizure onsets in neocortical and pulvinar leads in two patients. Seizure onsets in the third patient were more variable. This is the first published report of brain‐responsive neurostimulation targeting the pulvinar to treat refractory regional onset epilepsy of posterior quadrant origin.

The aim of the study was to determine if corticothalamic responsive stimulation targeting the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CMT) is a potential treatment for neocortical epilepsies with regional onsets. Methods: We assessed efficacy and safety of CMT and neocortical responsive stimulation, detection, and stimulation programming, methods for implantation, and location and patterns of electrographic seizure onset and spread in 7 patients with medically intractable focal seizures with a regional neocortical onset. Results: The median follow-up duration was 17 months (average: 17 months, range: 8-28 months). The median % reduction in disabling seizures (excludes auras) in the 7 patients was 88% (mean: 80%, range: 55-100%). The median % reduction in all seizure types (disabling + auras) was 73% (mean: 67%, range: 15-94%). There were no adverse events related to implantation of the responsive neurostimulator and leads or related to the delivery of responsive stimulation. Stimulation-related contralateral paresthesias were addressed by adjusting stimulation parameters in the clinic during stimulation testing. Electrographic seizures were detected in the CMT and neocortex in all seven patients. Four patients had simultaneous or near simultaneous seizure onsets in the neocortex and CMT and three had onsets in the neocortex with spread to the CMT. Conclusion:In this small series of patients with medically intractable focal seizures and regional neocortical onset, responsive neurostimulation to the neocortex and CMT improved seizure control and was well tolerated. Significance: Responsive corticothalamic neurostimulation of the CMT and neocortex is a potential treatment for patients with regional neocortical epilepsies.

This study demonstrates that epilepsy surgery in the older population has similar seizure-free outcomes and complications when compared with younger patients for both mesial temporal and extratemporal origins. Caution regarding postoperative memory decline in the older population must be stressed.