BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation is indicated in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. We compared the clinical outcome of 180 consecutive patients who underwent transapical (TA) and transfemoral (TF) procedures in a single centre.MethodsNinety consecutive TA (TA-group) and 90 consecutive TF (TF-group) were performed from 2009 to 2014. Clinical variables were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed for hospital outcomes and to identify risk factors for hospital mortality, vascular complications and stroke.ResultsMean age was 80 ± 8.5 and 83 ± 8.4 years, in the TA and TF-group, respectively. TA-group presented higher prevalence of comorbidities: more vascular disease (79% vs 22%, p < 0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (32% vs 10%, p < 0.001), previous vascular surgery (14% vs 4%, p = 0.039), coronary disease (60% vs 40%, p = 0.007), and previous cardiac surgery (28% vs 17%, p = 0.073). Logistic Euroscore was 36 ± 15% in the TA-group and 25 ± 14% in the TF-group (p < 0.001), but hospital mortality was similar (TA:9%, TF:10%, p = 0.799). Access-related vascular complications occurred more often in transfemoral patients (TA:3%, TF:11%, p = 0.081) while major bleeding (TA:3%, TF:4%, p = 1) and stroke (TA:2%, TF:3%, p = 1) were equally distributed. Postoperative renal failure and dialysis were associated with impaired neurological outcome (p = 0.035 and p = 0.020, respectively). Mild to severe paravalvular leak was more prevalent in transfemoral patients (TA:5%, TF:25%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn our experience, the TA and TF-group presented different risk profiles but mortality rate and adverse neurological outcome had a similar incidence. The transfemoral approach carried more vascular complications and paravalvular leaks but last-generation devices will improve this outcome.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

La maladie artérielle périphérique (MAP) est une problématique de santé majeure en Suisse, au même titre que l'infarctus du myocarde ou l'AVC, tous les trois partageant des facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire (FRCV) communs et des mécanismes physiopathologiques similaires (athérosclérose). Malheureusement, l'importance de la MAP est encore souvent sous-estimée, alors qu'elle est grevée d'une morbidité et d'une mortalité importantes et augmente le risque cardiovasculaire (CV) global du patient. Il est capital d'améliorer la prévention secondaire afin de diminuer ce fardeau et le risque CV global du patient. Nous allons passer en revue les cibles de traitement des FRCV en prévention secondaire chez les patients avec MAP et voir comment l'utilisation d'un passeport vasculaire permet d'améliorer la prise en charge. Vascular passport : a tool for secondary prevention among patients with peripheral artery diseasePeripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a major health problem in Switzerland, as myocardial infarction or stroke, all three sharing common cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and similar pathophysiological mechanisms (atherosclerosis). Unfortunately, PAD is still often overlooked, despite being fraught with significant morbidity/ mortality and increasing the patient's overall CV risk. It is therefore essential to improve secondary prevention in order to decrease this burden and the overall CV risk of the patient. We will review the treatment targets for CV risk factors as secondary prevention in patients with PAD and see how the use of a vascular passport may improve management.