PURPOSE Standard first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–directed oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Adding pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy to an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor may improve outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring an EGFR-sensitizing mutation and a performance status of 0 to 2 who were planned to receive first-line palliative therapy. Random assignment was 1:1 to gefitinib 250 mg orally per day (Gef) or gefitinib 250 mg orally per day plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under curve 5 intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed (gefitinib plus chemotherapy [Gef+C]). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2018, 350 patients were randomly assigned to Gef (n = 176) and Gef+C (n = 174). Twenty-one percent of patients had a performance status of 2, and 18% of patients had brain metastases. Median follow-up time was 17 months (range, 7 to 30 months). Radiologic response rates were 75% and 63% in the Gef+C and Gef arms, respectively ( P = .01). Estimated median PFS was significantly longer with Gef+C than Gef (16 months [95% CI, 13.5 to 18.5 months] v 8 months [95% CI, 7.0 to 9.0 months], respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.66]; P < .001). Estimated median OS was significantly longer with Gef+C than Gef (not reached v 17 months [95% CI, 13.5 to 20.5 months]; hazard ratio for death, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]; P < .001). Clinically relevant grade 3 or greater toxicities occurred in 51% and 25% of patients in the Gef+C and Gef arms, respectively ( P < .001). CONCLUSION Adding pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy to gefitinib significantly prolonged PFS and OS but increased toxicity in patients with NSCLC.

Lipocalin 2 is a siderophore‐binding protein that regulates iron homeostasis. Lipocalin 2 expression is elevated in multiple tumor types; however, the mechanisms that drive tumor progression upon Lipocalin 2 expression remain unclear. When Lipocalin 2 is over‐expressed, it leads to resistance to 5‐fluorouracil in colon cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting ferroptosis. Lipocalin 2 inhibits ferroptosis by decreasing intracellular iron levels and stimulating the expression of glutathione peroxidase4 and a component of the cysteine glutamate antiporter, xCT. The increase in xCT levels is dependent on increased levels of ETS1 in Lipocalin 2 over‐expressing cells. Inhibiting Lipocalin 2 function with a monoclonal antibody leads to a decrease in chemo‐resistance and transformation in vitro, and a decrease in tumor progression and chemo‐resistance in xenograft mouse models. Lipocalin 2 and xCT levels exhibit a positive correlation in human tumor samples suggesting that the pathway we have identified in cell lines is operative in human tumor samples. These results indicate that Lipocalin 2 is a potential therapeutic target and that the monoclonal antibody described in our study can serve as the basis for a potential therapeutic in patients who do not respond to chemotherapy.

The extent of resection for proximal third gastric cancer does not influence the clinical outcome. PG and TG have similar survival rates. Both procedures can be accomplished safely. Therefore, PG should be an alternative to TG, even in locally advanced proximal gastric cancers treated by NACT, provided that the tumor size and location permit preservation of adequate remnant of stomach without compromising oncological resection margins. Future QOL studies would further lend credence to the concept of PG for proximal third gastric cancer.