To determine the effects of hydrotherapy and land-based exercises on functional mobility and quality of life among patients with knee osteoarthritis. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a randomized controlled trial with knee osteoarthritis patients randomly allocated into land-based (n=17) and hydrotherapy groups (n=17). The Time-Up and Go (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand (5STS), Stair Climbing Test (SCT), and Quality of Life by questionnaires including the Modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire Thai version (Thai WOMAC) were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. The World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF Thai version (WHOQOL-BREF-THAI) questionnaire were assessed at baseline and six weeks and 6 months. [Results] There was no significant difference in outcomes between the groups after 6-weeks and 6-months of follow-up. After 6 weeks, Thai WOMAC score improved in both groups. Only 5STS was improved in the land-based group, while the hydrotherapy group showed significant TUG, 5STS, and SCT improvement. Furthermore, only hydrotherapy showed significant improvement in WHOQOL-BREF-THAI scores in the mental, social, quality of health, and total domains after six months. [Conclusion] Both exercises equally improved functional mobility and quality of life. Hydrotherapy and land-based exercise could improve functional mobility and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Background Real-time telerehabilitation (TR) is a new strategy for delivering rehabilitation interventions to older adults with musculoskeletal conditions, to provide continuity to conventional services and mitigate travel-related barriers. Objective We aimed to examine the effectiveness of treatment delivered via real-time TR services compared to conventional services among older adults with musculoskeletal conditions, in terms of physical performance, treatment adherence, and cost-effectiveness. Methods A literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2000 to April 2022 was conducted in six online databases: Cochrane Library, PubMed (ie, MEDLINE), PEDro, ClinicalKey, EBSCO, and ProQuest. The main eligibility criterion for articles was the use of real-time TR among older adults with musculoskeletal conditions to improve physical performance. Two reviewers screened 2108 abstracts and found 10 studies (n=851) that met the eligibility criteria. Quality assessment was based on version 2 of Cochrane’s risk-of-bias tool for RCTs, in order to assess the methodological quality of the selected articles. Results were pooled for meta-analyses, based on the primary outcome measures, and were reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. A fixed model was used, and subgroup analysis was performed to check for possible factors influencing TR’s effectiveness based on different treatments, controls, and outcome measures. Results The search and screening process identified 10 papers that collectively reported on three musculoskeletal conditions in older adults and three types of TR programs. Aggregate results suggested that real-time TR, compared to conventional treatment, was more effective at improving physical performance regarding balance (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.36-0.9; I2=58.5%). TR was slightly better than usual care at improving range of motion (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.1-0.46; I2=0%) and muscle strength (SMD 0.76, 95% CI 0.32-1.2; I2=59.60%), with moderate to large effects. Subgroup analyses suggested that real-time TR had medium to large effects favoring the use of smartphones or tablets (SMD 0.92, 95% CI 0.56-1.29; I2=45.8%), whereas the use of personal computers (SMD 0.25, 95% CI –0.16 to 0.66; I2=0%) had no effect on improving balance and was comparable to conventional treatment. Conclusions We found that real-time TR improved physical performance in older adults with musculoskeletal conditions, with an effectiveness level equal to that of conventional face-to-face treatment. Therefore, real-time TR services may constitute an alternative strategy for the delivery of rehabilitation services to older adults with musculoskeletal conditions to improve their physical performance. We also observed that the ideal device for delivering TR is the smartphone. Results suggested that the use of smartphones for TR is driven by ease of use among older adults. We encourage future studies in areas related to rehabilitation in older adults, in addition to examination of physical performance outcomes, to gain additional knowledge about comprehensive care. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42021287289; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=287289

No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND Effectiveness of real-time telerehabilitation (RTTR) were evaluated in this systematic review on physical performance, adherence, and cost-effectiveness among elderly people with musculoskeletal condition. OBJECTIVE A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in Cochrane, PubMed/MEDLINE and PEDro according to PRISMA guidelines. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in the area that involved elderly people with musculoskeletal conditions and any physical performance indexes were included. video conference and phone call were kind of RTTR was defined as a specific remote rehabilitation intervention to allowing healthcare professional/patient interaction. Information regarding the effect and feasibility (intervention completion rate) of RTTR was extracted from eligible articles. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021287289 RESULTS Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for revised randomized trials to assess methodological quality of the included articles. Eventually, seven studies were included as eligible articles. The overall risk of bias judgment was assessed as “High” in one studies. All studies were conducted in either South Korea, Canada, Italy, the USA, or Australia, and heterogeneity in terms of participants’ health condition and intervention regimen was observed across the studies. Our narrative-based analysis were reported across the seven studies showed that compared with conventional rehabilitation, either equal or better effects on physical performance. The intervention completion rates were 87%± 9 on average (range 67–97%). CONCLUSIONS Although our studies were limited relevant information with heterogeneity make obtain we could not conclusive evidence, our findings suggest that RTTR can be a strategy for rehabilitation service delivery with acceptable feasibility comparable to conventional rehabilitation for elderly people with musculoskeletal. CLINICALTRIAL the PROSPERO registration number CRD42021287289; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/