We describe the experience of integrating COVID-19 screening and testing into a mobile TB screening unit in Lima, Peru. All attendees received chest radiographs, which were analysed using CAD4TB and CAD4COVID; Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra was used to test for TB, and antibody and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. One Xpert-positive TB case was diagnosed per 168 people screened, one person with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies per 3 people screened, and one PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection per 8 people screened. Integrated screening can help to avoid delays in the diagnosis of both TB and COVID-19.

Background Rapid IgM/IgG antibody tests were largely used in lieu of RT-PCR tests as part of COVID-19 public health response activities in Lima, Peru. To assess their utility, we explored the relationship between the time since onset of several COVID-19-related symptoms and the sensitivity of a rapid combined IgM/IgG antibody test. Methods We collected data from a community sample of individuals (n = 492) who received concurrent RT-PCR and rapid IgM/IgG antibody testing between May 2020 and March 2021. We estimated the sensitivity of the antibody test, against the RT-PCR test, by weeks since symptom onset via segmented regression analysis. Results The overall sensitivity of the rapid IgM/IgG antibody test was 46.7% (95% CI, 42.4–51.2%). Among 372 (75.6%) participants who reported COVID-19-related symptoms, sensitivity increased from 30.4% (95% CI, 24.7–36.6%) in week 1 after symptom onset to 83.3% (95% CI, 41.6–98.4%) in week 4. The test sensitivity increased by 31.9% (95% CI, 24.8–39.0%) per week until week 2 to 3, then decreased by − 6.0% (95% CI, − 25.7–13.7%) per week thereafter. Conclusion Rapid antibody tests are a poor substitute for RT-PCR testing, regardless of presenting symptoms. This highlights the need for future pandemic planning to include timely and equitable access to gold-standard diagnostics, treatment, and vaccination.

We report SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity among market and city bus depot workers in Lima, Peru. Among 1,285 vendors from eight markets, prevalence ranged from 27-73%. Among 488 workers from three city bus depots, prevalence ranged from 11-47%. Self-reported symptoms were infrequent.