No abstract

The performance of in-network caching in informationcentric networks, and of cache networks more generally, is typically characterized by network-centric performance metrics such as hit rate and hop count, with approaches to locating and caching content evaluated and optimized for these metrics. We believe that user-centric performance metrics, in particular the delay from when a content request is made by the user to the time at which the requested content has been completely downloaded, are also important. For such metrics, performance is often determined by link capacity constraints and network congestion. We investigate network cache management and search policies that account for path-level (content-server to content-requestor) congestion and file popularity in order to directly minimize user-centric, content-download delay. Through simulation, we find that our policies yield significantly better download delay performance than existing policies, even though these existing policies provide better performance according to traditional metrics such as cache hit rate and hop count.

Centrality is a concept often used in social network analysis to study different properties of networks that are modeled as graphs. We present a new centrality metric called Localized Bridging Centrality (LBC). LBC is based on the Bridging Centrality (BC) metric that Hwang et al. recently introduced. Bridging nodes are nodes that are located in between highly connected regions. LBC is capable of identifying bridging nodes with an accuracy comparable to that of the BC metric for most networks. As the name suggests, we use only local information from surrounding nodes to compute the LBC metric, while, global knowledge is required to calculate the BC metric. The main difference between LBC and BC is that LBC uses the egocentric definition of betweenness centrality to identify bridging nodes, while BC uses the sociocentric definition of betweenness centrality. Thus, our LBC metric is suitable for distributed computation and has the benefit of being an order of magnitude faster to calculate in computational complexity. We compare the results produced by BC and LBC in three examples. We applied our LBC metric for network analysis of a real wireless mesh network. Our results indicate that the LBC metric is as powerful as the BC metric at identifying bridging nodes that have a higher flow of information through them (assuming a uniform distribution of network flows) and are important for the robustness of the network.

No abstract

No abstract