The prevalence of pruritus in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients has varied over the years, and some studies suggest the prevalence may be coming down with more effective dialysis. Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), previously called uremic pruritus, is a distressing symptom experienced by patients with mainly advanced chronic kidney disease. CKD-aP is associated with poor quality of life, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and increased mortality. The incidence of CKD-aP is decreasing given improvements in dialysis treatments, but approximately 40% of patients with end-stage renal disease experience CKD-aP. While the pathogenesis of CKD-aP is not well understood, the interaction between non-myelinated C fibers and dermal mast cells plays an important role in precipitation and sensory stimulation. Other causes of CKD-aP include metabolic abnormalities such as abnormal serum calcium, parathyroid, and phosphate levels; an imbalance in opiate receptors is also an important factor. CKD-aP usually presents as large symmetric reddened areas of skin, often at night. Managing CKD-aP is a challenge. Research in this area is difficult because most studies are not comparable given their small group samples, study designs, and lack of standardized study measures. The most commonly used treatment is a combination of narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy and a μ-opioid receptor antagonist such as naltrexone.
e18569 Background: The novel SARS COV2 pandemic has disrupted cancer treatment, both preventive as well as treatment services. We aimed to study the clinical outcomes of cancer patients who were hospitalised before and during the pandemic. Methods: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) 2016-2020 was queried to identify adult patients (Age > 18 years) with a diagnosis of cancer using the ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases) codes. Study population was stratified based on the year of admission- 2016 to 2019 vs 2020 (the pandemic year). Primary outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges (THC). Secondary outcomes included prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE), ICU admission, acute respiratory failure (ARF), blood transfusion, and sepsis. Statistics were performed using multivariate linear and logistic regression using STATA v17. Results: There were 18 million admissions in adults with cancer from 2016-2020. Among them 14.6 million (81.1%) were hospitalised during 2016-2019 (pre pandemic) whereas 3.4 million (18.9%) were hospitalized in 2020 (pandemic). There was no significant difference in the mean age of both groups, pandemic group had higher charlson comorbidity burden (66.4 vs 63.7%, p < 0.01). Pandemic group had higher rates of DM (26 vs 24%), CHF (15 vs 13.8%), CKD (18 vs 16.5%), dyslipidemia (36.4 vs 33%), PEM (15 vs 13%), anemia (44 vs 42) all p < 0.01. A total of 835,065 cancer patients died during the study period, the mortality rate in the pre-pandemic and pandemic years was 4.5% and 5% respectively (p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, the all-cause mortality was increased in the pandemic group (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.12, p < 0.01). The adjusted LOS was decreased by 0.1 days (95% CI: 0.06- 0.20, p < 0.01)). The adjusted total hospitalization charges was increased by $12,891 (95% CI: 9745-16,035, p < 0.01). Pandemic group had higher odds of sepsis (7.8 vs 6.5%), mechanical ventilation (4 vs 3%), pressor requirements (1.5 vs 1%), acute kidney injury (10 vs 7%) and acute respiratory failure (10 vs 7%), all p < 0.01. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients with a high prevalence of medical comorbidities were more likely to be admitted to the hospital with COVID infection. The higher mortality in these patients was likely the result of higher secondary complications, also likely leading to earlier death explaining the lower LOS and higher hospitalization charges. Cancer patients with medical comorbidities should take higher preventive measures from COVID including encouraging continued primary vaccinations and regular boosters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.