The present nationwide study suggested that there was no significant difference in the rate of survival to hospital discharge between cardiogenic OHCA patients with persistent ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival treated with amiodarone or lidocaine.
Background: Because of the aging of the Japanese population, traumatic brain injuries (TBI) have increased in elderly adults. However, the effectiveness and prognosis of intensive treatment for geriatric TBI have not yet been determined. Thus, we used nationwide data from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank (JNTDB) projects to analyze prognostic factors for intensive and aggressive treatments.
Methods:We analyzed 1,879 geriatric TBI cases (age !65 years) registered in four JNTDB projects: Project 1998 (P1998) to Project 2015 (P2015). Clinical features, use of aggressive treatment, and 6-month outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were compared among study projects. Logistic regression was used to identify prognostic factors in aggressively treated patients.
Results:The percentage of geriatric TBI cases significantly increased with time-P1998: 30.1%; Project 2004 (P2004): 34.6%; Project 2009 (P2009): 43.9%; P2015: 53.6%, p<0.0001). Use of aggressive treatment also significantly increased, from 67.0% in P1998 to 69.3% in P2015 (p<0.0001). Less invasive methods, such as trepanation and normothermic targeted temperature management, were more often chosen for geriatric patients. These efforts resulted in a significant decrease in the 6-month mortality rate, from 76.2% in P1998 to 63.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003), although the percentage of severely disabled patients increased, from 8.9% in P1998 to 11.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003). Intraventricular hemorrhage was the factor most strongly associated with unfavorable 6-month outcomes (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.78-8.06, p<0.0001).
Conclusions:Less invasive treatments reduced mortality in geriatric TBI but did not improve functional outcomes. Patient age was not the strongest prognostic factor; thus, physicians should consider characteristics other than age.
Background: The increase of serum brain natriuretic peptide (sBNP) is well known in patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, the pathophysiology between the clinical severity of SAH and the sBNP secretion is still not clear. The aim of this study is thus to clarify the cardiovascular pathophysiological mechanisms of sBNP secretion in severe SAH patients. Methods: From the database of multicenter prospective study (SAH PiCCO study), sBNP level was compared among initial Hunt and Kosnik (H-K) gradings on the first day. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was applied to decide the threshold existing between severe (H-K grade 4-5) and non-severe (H-K grade 2-3) patients. Cardiopulmonary parameters were also measured with thermodilution techniques and compared between low and high sBNP groups. Results: sBNP level was significantly higher in severe patients than in non-severe patients (566.5 ± 204.2 vs. 155.7 ± 32.8 pg/ml, p = 0.034). Based on ROC analysis, the threshold value that divides severe and non-severe was 78.6 pg/ml (AUC = 0.79). In the higher sBNP group (≥78.6 pg/ml), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI) and intrathoracic blood volume index (ITVI), which indicate the cardiac preload, were significantly higher than in the low sBNP group. The systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), the indicator for sympathetic activation and cardiac afterload, was also higher in the high BNP group. Conclusions: In severe SAH patients, sBNP elevation was significantly associated with the increase of both cardiac preload and afterload. sBNP may be a good severity biomarker in SAH patients, reflecting the systemic impact it makes on cardiovascular preload and afterload.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.