OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine the association between muscle cross-sectional area and attenuation, as measured on routine CT scans, and mortality in older patients with hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective 10-year study of patients with hip fracture was conducted with the following inclusion criteria: age 65 years or older, first-time hip fracture treated with surgery, and CT of the chest, abdomen, or pelvis. This yielded 274 patients (70.4% women; mean [± SD] age, 81.3 ± 8.3 years). On each CT scan, two readers independently measured the size (cross-sectional area, indexed for patient height) and attenuation of the paravertebral muscle at T12 and the psoas muscle at L4. We then determined the association between overall mortality and the muscle size and muscle attenuation, while adjusting for demographic variables (age, sex, ethnicity, and body mass index), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). RESULTS The overall mortality rate increased from 28.3% at 1 year to 79.5% at 5 years. Mortality was associated with decreased thoracic muscle size (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49–0.87). This association persisted after adjusting for demographic variables (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50–0.95), the ASA classification (OR, 0.70; CI, 0.51–0.97), and the CCI (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52–1.00). Similarly, decreased survival was associated with decreased thoracic muscle attenuation after adjusting for all of these combinations of covariates (OR, 0.67–0.72; 95% CI, 0.49–0.99). Decreased lumbar muscle size and attenuation trended with decreased survival but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION In older adults with hip fractures, CT findings of decreased thoracic paravertebral muscle size and attenuation are associated with decreased overall survival.

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established as the preferred noninvasive tool for meniscal evaluation. To our knowledge, there has been no study examining the utility of diagnosing meniscal extrusion from radiography alone. We hypothesize that with appropriate window settings, meniscal extrusion may be diagnosed on radiography with high sensitivity and specificity.Materials and methodsWe included 190 patients with MRI of the knee performed within three months of knee radiography. As defined within the literature, we utilized the MRI criteria of meniscal extrusion as meniscal tissue extending 3 mm or greater beyond the tibial plateau, excluding osteophytes. Two attending radiologists blindly and independently identified the absence or presence, in millimeters, of medial meniscal extrusion on plain film radiography. Kappa test and Pearson correlation coefficient were calculated to assess the extent of inter-reader agreement and correlation. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each reader, assuming the concurrent MRI served as the gold standard.ResultsNinety-six patients had medial meniscal extrusion and 94 had no medial extrusion by MRI. Kappa test for inter-reader agreement = 0.61. Pearson coefficient for inter-reader measurement correlation = 0.69. Reader A had sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.69) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.94). Reader B had sensitivity of 0.61 (95% CI 0.51-0.71) and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.91).ConclusionThere is substantial inter-reader agreement and high correlation of meniscal extrusion measurement between readers. Our results suggest that while radiographs have low sensitivity for evaluation of meniscal extrusion, their high specificity may be of clinical utility.