Introduction: Total laryngectomy/pharingo-laryngectomy is a potentially aggressive surgery for advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinomas, which results in important physical and functional changes that compromise some of the most vital functions, including speech communication. For these patients, tracheoesophageal speech is considered to be the gold standard for voice rehabilitation. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to determinate the success rate of voice prosthesis rehabilitation, voice prosthesis lifetime and the rate of complications, and its related clinicopathologic factors. Material and Methods: Retrospective review of 92 patients who undergone tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) performed between January 2007 and December 2012 at the Francisco Gentil Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Oporto. Age, primary disease, staging, the extent of surgical resection, radiotherapy treatment, timing of TEP, surgical and prosthesis-related complications were noted. The impact of these clinicpathological factors on functional outcome, complications of TEP and lifetime of prosthetic valves was assessed in univariate analysis. Vocal rehabilitation efficacy with voice prosthesis was assessed with the multidimensional Harrison-Robillard Shultz (HRS) Rating Scale. Lifetime of voice prosthesis and early and late complications were recorded. Results: A total of 83 patients met the study criteria, predominantly males (94%) with a mean age of 63.7 years. 77% of the patients underwent primary and 23% secondary TEP. 68.7% of patients achieved functional tracheoesophageal speech (HRS score ≥ 10) , 67.2% had performed primary TEP and 73.7% had performed secondary TEP. The mean device lifetime was 9.8 months for voice prosthesis. Prosthesis-related complications occurred in 81% of the patients and the most common issues were prosthesis leakage (76%) and displacement (22%). The most common surgical-related problem was a large and deep tracheostoma. Conclusions: Our success rate of voice rehabilitation was comparable to that reported in published literature with a satisfactory median device lifetime. Because of its safety and simplicity, tracheoe-sophageal puncture is considered to be an effective method for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Background and Aim: The undersizing of the bypass graft diameter compared to native artery changes blood flow characteristics and velocity which may affect conduit neo-endothelialization, intimal hyperplasia reaction and patency. The aim of this study was to evaluate conduit neoendothelialization, intimal hyperplasia reaction and patency results between undersized and matched ePTFE grafts. Material and Methods: In 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats, undersized (1-mm internal diameter) and matched (2-mm internal diameter) ePTFE grafts were anastomosed end-to-end in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. Blood flow volume per minute was measured and wall shear stress was calculated for each group. After 3 weeks of follow-up, angiography was performed via the left carotid artery just before sacrifice. Conduit neoendothelialization and intimal hyperplasia reaction were measured by computer-assisted morphometry. Results: Wall shear stress was 8 times higher for the undersized group (840.56 vs. 105.07 mPa). Three weeks after implantation, conduit neoendothelialization was better in matched grafts compared to undersized grafts (441 vs. 574 µm, p = 0.008). Intimal hyperplasia reaction was similar for both groups (8.7 vs. 6.7 µm2/µm for undersized and matched grafts, respectively). Patency rate was 7/8 for undersized and 8/8 for matched ePTFE grafts. Conclusion: Although the graft patency and the intimal hyperplasia reaction were not different between the two groups after 3 weeks, matched grafts had a significantly better endothelialization compared to undersized grafts. This short-term beneficial effect may influence long-term patency results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.